MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404981920 · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.015

Impact of intraoperative hypotension during laparoscopic liver resection on postoperative complications including acute kidney injury

2024· article· en· W4404981920 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Tibor Josef Magyar, Luckshi Rajendran, S. Babakhani, Woo Jin Choi, Zhihao Li, Roxana Bucur, Marco P. A. W. Claasen, Trevor Reichman, Chaya Shwaartz, Ian D. McGilvray, Sean P. Cleary, Carol‐Anne Moulton, Stuart A. McCluskey, Gonzalo Sapisochín

Bibliographic record

VenueSurgery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAcute kidney injuryResectionAnesthesiaLaparoscopySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Postoperative acute kidney injury is associated with an increase in hospital length of stay and mortality. Intraoperative hemodynamics and fluid management may contribute to acute kidney injury. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between intraoperative duration of hypotension with adverse events after laparoscopic liver resection. METHODS: A prospective cohort including adult patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection between January 2010 and June 2022. Cumulative time below mean arterial blood pressure thresholds and association with major adverse events composing of postoperative acute kidney injury (≤2 days) and complications (Dindo-Clavien ≥3a) ≤30 days were assessed. RESULTS: In 360 patients, the median age was 61 years, 206 (57%) were male, median body mass index was 26.3, and 129 (36%) patients had hepatocellular carcinoma. Acute kidney injury was recorded in 3 (0.8%) patients as stage 1, 6 (1.7%) patients as stage 2, and 7 (1.9%) patients as stage 3. Major adverse events occurred in 31 (8.6%) patients, and the median estimated blood loss was 200 mL. On continuous analysis, a threshold <60 mmHg at ≥15 minutes was found for major adverse events. The mean arterial blood pressure <55 mmHg for ≥20 minutes was associated with an increased risk of major adverse events (odds ratio 7.72; P < .001). In patients with >15 minutes of mean arterial blood pressure <60 mmHg, higher intravenous volume was associated with increase in major adverse events (P = .045), whereas adjusted intravenous volume was not associated with major adverse events (P = .657), acute kidney injury (P = .681), or blood loss (P = .875). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic liver resection is a safe procedure with a low risk of acute kidney injury. After ≥15 minutes at mean arterial blood pressure <60 mmHg, the risk of major adverse events increases. Greater intravenous fluid infusion volume was associated with an observed risk for major adverse events, suggesting that mean arterial blood pressure should be managed by vasoactive agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSurgerySame topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207