MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404984590 · doi:10.34120/ajas.v11i3.569

دراسة مقارنة بين موقف المرأة الخليجية والمرأة الغربية تجاه القيادة في العمل

2004· article· ar· W4404984590 on OpenAlexfundno aff
مارك نيل, جيم فينلاي, نوري بيروتي

Bibliographic record

Venueالمجلة العربية للعلوم الإدارية. · 2004
Typearticle
Languagear
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAston UniversitySultan Qaboos UniversityLouisiana Tech UniversityUniversity of ReadingYork UniversityLebanese American University
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

تهدف هذه الدراسة المقارنة إلى مناقشة وتحليل الاختلاف في موقف المرأة في المجتمع الخليجي العربي والمجتمع الغربي بالنسبة للقيادة. وأظهرت الدراسة وجود اختلاف مهم من جانب البعد التحليلي، "التقليدي" و "التعاوني". ويفسر هذا الاختلاف بين المجموعتين في نطاق الخلفية التاريخية والثقافية لهما. وتسعى هذه الدراسة إلى إثراء المعرفة والإسهام في الحوار حول نظرة المرأة الخليجية وموقفها بالنسبة للقيادة، كما أنها تعطي مساحة أوسع من الحوار ليشمل النساء من الدول النامية الأخرى.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2020.267

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueالمجلة العربية للعلوم الإدارية.→Same topicMilitary Technology and Strategies→French-language works237,207→