Bibliographic record
Abstract
The occurrence frequency distributions (size distributions) are the most important diagnostics for self-organized criticality systems. There are at least three formats for size distributions: (i) the differential size distribution function, (ii) the cumulative size distribution function, and (iii) the rank-order plot. Each of the three formats (or methods) has at least three ranges of event sizes: (i) a range with statistically incomplete sampling; (ii) an inertial range or power law fitting range with statistically complete sampling; and (iii) a range bordering finite system sizes. Only the intermediate range with power law behavior should be used to determine the power law slope from fitting the observed size distributions. The establishment of power law functions in a given observed size distribution depends crucially on the choice of the fitting range, which should have a logarithmic range of at least 2–3 decades. Often the fitted distribution functions exhibit significant deviations from an ideal power law and can be fitted better with alternative functions, such as log-normal distributions, Pareto type-II distributions, and Weibull distributions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".