MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404989280 · doi:10.1017/9781009562942.013

Coronal Mass Ejections

2024· book-chapter· en· W4404989280 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronal mass ejectionCoronal planePhysicsMedicineNuclear physicsPlasmaSolar windRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solar flares are commonly accompanied by coronal mass ejections (CME), and thus CMEs display similar size distributions and waiting time distributions as solar flares do. However, some studies report relatively steep power law slopes with values of , which most likely are caused by a bias due to neglecting background subtraction in GOES data. The datasets from LASCO/SOHO are not affected by this background bias, because the white light background from CMEs appears to be sufficiently faint or nonexisting. Waiting time distributions are sampled from a variety of CME and flare catalogs, such as CDAW, LASCO/SOHO, ARTEMIS, CACTus SEEDS, and CORIMP. These waiting time distributions are found to be consistent with the theoretical prediction of the standard FD-SOC model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicIntestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsFrench-language works237,207