MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404992555 · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112576

Dandelion center detection in perennial ryegrass with Heat maps using Convolutional Neural Networks

2024· article· en· W4404992555 on OpenAlexafffund
Ibrahim Babiker, Jamal Bentahar, Wenfang Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Soft Computing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkPerennial plantDandelionComputer scienceCenter (category theory)Artificial intelligenceAgronomyMedicineBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Industrial agricultural practices largely involve automated weed control processes and techniques. This phenomenon can also be seen in horticulture and landscaping. Generally, dandelion weeds (Taraxacum officinale) are a common pest and their detection is necessary for any type of removal. To address this detection issue, a cost-effective and intuitive labeling method using Heat maps is proposed for marking dandelion plant centers within perennial rye-grass. This method relies on approximate localization as opposed to pinpoint accuracy. An expandable lightweight Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is built on a base network to generate detection output maps at two resolutions. Multiple loss functions are expanded to multi-instance predictions and their combinations are examined through ablation to assess and rank their performance. Different methods of computing standard performance metrics are also explored. Also, different backbone networks are also shown to reveal varying performance advantages. Through these methods, dandelion weed centers can consistently be located with robustness to noise and erroneous labels and with good precision. Furthermore, our method is almost entirely end-to-end. The experimental results demonstrate that our methods outperform Semantic Segmentation models in the precision of output maps while avoiding the need of intensive labeling costs. In addition, when applying Hierarchical Clustering to the segmentation maps for a complete comparison in center detection, our methods double the accuracy and do not require the manual tuning of cluster parameters. Our proposed application of soft computing can be used in the landscaping industry and adapted to other fields with relative ease. The binary classification and object detection tasks of locating dandelion plants can be extended to multi-class problems with other plants. • Dandelion centers are detected in grass with Heat maps in largely end-to-end manner. • An alternative labeling method is proposed and it proves precise and robust. • An ablation study of different loss functions’ performance is carried out. • Multiple resolution prediction outputs are tested and compared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Soft ComputingSame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207