Bibliographic record
Abstract
This ‘Editor’s introduction’ notes the interviews and articles published in issue 14.2, all of which address the featured theme: LGBTQ+ films and filmmakers. The interview with Jenni Olson considers her long, multi-hyphenate career in queer cinema as a filmmaker, historian and archivist. The interview with Goran Stolevski focuses on his two award-winning fiction shorts, You Deserve Everything (2015) and Would You Look at Her (2017). The research articles focus on the following: Jenni Olson’s experimental short, Blue Diary; influential post-war avant-garde filmmaker Gregory Markopoulos’s Flowers of Asphalt; the two obscenity trials brought against exhibitors who screened Kenneth Anger’s short films, Fireworks (1947) and Scorpio Rising (1963); the racial and sexual politics of two Canadian shorts, Afronautic Research Lab: Newfoundland (2019) and Welcome to Africville (1999); a short documentary, Playback, that uses archival footage from the late 1980s of a queer nightclub community in Argentina; and the punk avant-garde short filmmaker, Australian Kim Miles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.042 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.171 | 0.083 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".