MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404995025 · doi:10.1016/j.watbs.2024.100330

Passage efficiency and behavioral performance of Schizothorax davidi through different sections of a long vertical slot fishway

2024· article· en· W4404995025 on OpenAlexaff
Jianghui Bao, Xiang Wang, Weiwei Li, Chaoshuo Zhang, Xiang-Yuan Mi, Dongxu Zhang, William M. Twardek, Hsien‐Yung Lin, Ye Qiao, Steven J. Cooke, Ming Duan

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Biology and Security · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPerformance improvementOperations managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fish passage facilities are constructed worldwide to enable fish to pass anthropogenic obstacles (i.e., dams) and re-establish river connectivity. The construction of these facilities involves sophisticated engineering designed to attract fish and enable passage. The behavior of fish encountering these structures, particularly in long vertical slot fishways, has been poorly studied. This study was conducted on the Daduhe River in Southwest China to quantify the upstream passage efficiency and performance of tagged Schizothorax davidi in different sections of a long vertical slot fishway spanning 1228.3 m. The overall passage efficiency was 13% although the passage efficiency in seven sections (A0-A1, A1-A2, A2-A3, A3-A4, A4-A5, A5-A6, A6-A7) ranged from 43% to 100% reflecting differences in slope among sections. The highest passage efficiency was documented in rest pool sections with a slope of 0 (A3-A4, 100% and A6-A7, 100%) and during passage through the dam itself (A5-A6, 90.0%). The lowest passage efficiency was section A2-A3, where a garbage interception facility affected passage efficiency. Average transit time from A0 to A7 was 85.2 hours and ranged from 8.8 to 237.6 hours. Transit speed varied over various sections. The first section (i.e., A0-A1) had slow transit speeds which presumably was influenced by acclimation and recovery from tag implantation. After this, the transit speed had a slight increase but decreased again. Additionally, more than half (5 out of 9 fish) of the fish fell back after reaching the most upstream section and reascended the fishway which tripled the total passage time for those individuals. No significant diel activity rhythms were observed, but a strong bimodal distribution was noted in fish transit time when passing the first monitoring site. Cox-proportional hazards model showed that transit time was negatively correlated with body size but positively correlated with water level and water temperature. Our study provides valuable insights into activity when passing through a long fishway, which can inform design of fishway structures and operational patterns to improve upstream passage efficiency. Specifically, we recommend increasing the number of resting pools and maintaining appropriate water levels to reduce transit time and fallback frequency in long fishways. • Assessing overall and different sections passage efficiency. • Quantifying the behavioral metrics and variations of migratory fish in different sections. • Analyzing the factors affecting behavioral metrics. • Providing valuable information to inform design and operational changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Biology and SecuritySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207