Les pratiques citoyennes de sensibilisation communautaire coproduites durant la pandémie et les tensions liées à leur pérennisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Québec, les pratiques citoyennes de sensibilisation communautaire, qui jouent un rôle de mobilisation et de soutien aux interventions de proximité, sont en plein essor depuis la pandémie, et restent, dans une large part, à documenter. Cet article veut rendre compte d’une recherche qui propose de comprendre de telles pratiques mises en place dans deux quartiers défavorisés du Nord de l’île de Montréal. Il s’agit d’analyser ces pratiques à partir des expériences vécues par les citoyen.ne.s et les intervenant.e.s impliqué.e.s. Les résultats identifient des facteurs favorables à l’émergence de ces pratiques de proximité, tels que l’engagement citoyen et le respect de la mission des organismes communautaires. Une discussion permet de problématiser des tensions vécues entre l’engagement citoyen et l’activité de travail rémunéré ainsi qu’entre la santé publique et les missions des organismes impliqués.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".