MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404998584 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db291422

Cyberattacks on the Middle East will continue to rise

2024· article· en· W4404998584 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeopoliticsCyberwarfareMiddle EastPolitical scienceQuarter (Canadian coin)EconomyGeographyLawPoliticsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Cyber offensives in the Middle East and North Africa tripled year-on-year in the first quarter of 2024. This surge is directly linked to the geopolitical turmoil in the region, with cyberwarfare playing a critical role in the conflicts between Israel and Hamas, Hezbollah, the Huthis and Iran. Impacts Cybergroups will continue to target critical national infrastructure and media outlets, notably in Israel and the Palestinian territories. Cooperation between Iran, Russia and North Korea will play out in the cyberwarfare arena, with actors coordinating to mask attack origins. Regional governmental and private-sector efforts to implement data privacy and security regulations will receive a boost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicCybersecurity and Cyber Warfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207