MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405003031 · doi:10.56134/jst.v3i2.85

Implementation of a Rule-Based Decision Support System in Determining the Level of Customer Satisfaction with Services

2024· article· en· W4405003031 on OpenAlexaff
Kerry Buck Manulak, Shaiful, Wisda Wisda, Mandeine Resyi

Bibliographic record

VenueCeddi Journal of Information System and Technology (JST) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Retrieval and Data Mining
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocumentationCustomer satisfactionData collectionService qualityService (business)Decision support systemComputer scienceProcess managementKnowledge managementEngineeringBusinessMarketingData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sarmi Car Wash is a car and motorbike washing service located at Jalan Sultan Hasanuddin No. 52, offering pick-up and drop-off services within a specified range. To enhance employee performance and customer service, the business seeks to implement a decision support system (DSS) to monitor employee performance and assess customer satisfaction effectively. This research aims to design a web-based DSS application that utilizes rule-based assessments of employee performance, integrating data such as employee names and tenure as references for developing the system. The study employed data collection methods including observation, interviews, documentation, and literature review. The system was tested using the black-box method, confirming that it functions as intended. Additionally, based on a user assessment questionnaire, the application achieved an average score of 80.4%, indicating its suitability and effectiveness for implementation. The developed system provides an efficient solution for improving service quality and employee performance monitoring at Sarmi Car Wash.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCeddi Journal of Information System and Technology (JST)Same topicInformation Retrieval and Data MiningFrench-language works237,207