MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405006095 · doi:10.1111/oik.10991

Polyploidy confers better cold tolerance in <i>Daphnia</i>

2024· article· en· W4405006095 on OpenAlexafffund
Ivan Pecl, Pierre Blier, France Dufresne

Bibliographic record

VenueOikos · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEvolution and Genetic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDaphnia pulexPolyploidBiologySubarctic climatePloidyDaphniaSympatric speciationParthenogenesisTemperate climateZoologyEcologyGeneticsEvolutionary biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite decades of studies on the differential distribution of polyploid organisms, the causes of this pattern have yet to be elucidated. This study aimed to explore some of the possible physiological mechanisms explaining the differential northern distribution of polyploid clones of Daphnia pulex compared to the one of the diploid parental species. The critical thermal minimum (CTmin) was measured in 17 D. pulex clones of contrasted ploidy (diploid and triploid) and geographic origins (temperate and subarctic climates) reared under low and high temperatures (16 and 24°C). Triploid clones had better cold tolerance (lower CTmin) than both sympatric and temperate diploid clones. No significant association was found between CTmin and body size nor with cell size. We suggest that triploids might express a cold shock resistant phenotype related to higher gene expression and/or fatty acid profiles. Cold tolerance can be viewed as one of the possible reasons for polyploid preponderance in subarctic climates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOikosSame topicEvolution and Genetic DynamicsFrench-language works237,207