MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405008951 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103607

A designed predictive modelling strategy based on data decomposition and machine learning to forecast solar radiation

2024· article· en· W4405008951 on OpenAlexaff
Mumtaz Ali, Ramendra Prasad, Salman Alamery, Aitazaz A. Farooque

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSolar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
FundersKing Saud University
KeywordsDecompositionComputer scienceRadiationMachine learningArtificial intelligencePhysicsOpticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consistent with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 7, the design and optimization of clean energy resources (e.g., solar energy) is a highly motivating task for all researchers globally who continue to build research synergies that can tackle the future likelihood of energy crises due to socioeconomic and strategic environmental policy. In this paper, a weekly solar radiation (SR) forecasting model is designed using a robust local mean decomposition (RLMD) technique unified with a random forest (RF) algorithm to generate a fully optimised hybridized RLD-RF model that has a promising capability to forecast the SR values. In the first stage of model design, the RLMD, a frequency resolution method, is applied to decompose the original SR time series into amplitude modulation subseries (AMs), frequency modulation subseries (FMs), and the low-frequency product functions (PFs) to reveal the internal structure of the model construction data to incrementally optimize the RLD-RF model where only PFs were used. Subsequently, the statistically significant lagged subseries at a week ahead forecasting horizon (t – 1) of the low-frequency PFs with residual components are extracted individually, via partial autocorrelation function (PACF), to capture the historical behaviour of frequency-resolved SR component in order to build a robust modelling framework. Consequently, the random forest (RF) algorithm is employed to forecast each of the subseries using PACF-based lagged inputs to construct a fully optimised hybrid RLMD-RF predictive model. RLMD-RF is benchmarked against a baseline RF, M5tree, and multiple linear regression (MLR), Artificial neural network (ANN) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) algorithms, including their hybridized counterparts (i.e., RLMD-M5tree, RLMD-MLR, RLMD-ANN, and RLMD-GPR) using statistical score metrics in the independent testing phase. The results generated at test sites in Queensland State, Australia that have high solar energy potential confirm that the RLMD-RF method can produce quality predictions of weekly solar radiation against the benchmarking comparison models. For instance, RLMD-RF for Barcaldine are higher in terms (EWI= 0.938, ENS= 0.878) against RLMD-MLR (EWI = 0.845, ENS = 0.705), the RLMD-M5tree (EWI = 0.836, ENS = 0.684), RLMD-ANN (EWI = 0.836, ENS = 0.715), RLMD-GPR (EWI = 0.839, ENS = 0.716), the RF (EWI = 0.720, ENS = 0.564), the M5tree (EWI = 0.692, ENS = 0.522), the MLR (EWI = 0.683, ENS = 0.508), the ANN (EWI = 0.708, ENS = 0.519) and the GPR (EWI = 0.708, ENS = 0.520). Similarly, the RLMD-RF also outperformed in Rockhampton, Clermont, and Lockyer Valley stations as compared to other models. This research establishes the practical usefulness of hybridised RLMD-RF modelling framework for accurate SR forecasting and advocates its possible consideration in renewable and sustainable energy production and monitoring systems that can aid in decision-making by energy utilities and stakeholders (e.g., climate and energy policy experts).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResults in EngineeringSame topicSolar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207