MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405010156 · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106979

Deep clustering analysis via variational autoencoder with Gamma mixture latent embeddings

2024· article· en· W4405010156 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiaxun Guo, Wentao Fan, Manar Amayri, Nizar Bouguila

Bibliographic record

VenueNeural Networks · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAutoencoderCluster analysisArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceMixture modelMathematicsDeep learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes a novel deep clustering model based on the variational autoencoder (VAE), named GamMM-VAE, which can learn latent representations of training data for clustering in an unsupervised manner. Most existing VAE-based deep clustering methods use the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) as a prior on the latent space. We employ a more flexible asymmetric Gamma mixture model to achieve higher quality embeddings of the data latent space. Second, since the Gamma is defined for strictly positive variables, in order to exploit the reparameterization trick of VAE, we propose a transformation method from Gaussian distribution to Gamma distribution. This method can also be considered a Gamma distribution reparameterization trick, allows gradients to be backpropagated through the sampling process in the VAE. Finally, we derive the evidence lower bound (ELBO) based on the Gamma mixture model in an effective way for the stochastic gradient variational Bayesian (SGVB) estimator to optimize the proposed model. ELBO, a variational inference objective, ensures the maximization of the approximation of the posterior distribution, while SGVB is a method used to perform efficient inference and learning in VAEs. We validate the effectiveness of our model through quantitative comparisons with other state-of-the-art deep clustering models on six benchmark datasets. Moreover, due to the generative nature of VAEs, the proposed model can generate highly realistic samples of specific classes without supervised information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeural NetworksSame topicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFrench-language works237,207