Evoluția sarcinii la pacienta cu Rhesus negativ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Feto-maternal isoimmunization is a complex phenomenon in which the maternal immune system produces antibodies directed against antigens present on fetal blood cells. A common example of feto-maternal immunization is Rh isoimmunization, which occurs when an Rh-negative mother is exposed to the blood of an Rh-positive fetus. Maternal-fetal Rh isoimmunization causes more than 160,000 perinatal deaths and 100,000 cases of disability each year. In order to reduce perinatal mortality and morbidity from this pathology, recent guidelines from the French Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (CNGOF, 2017), the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO, 2021), and the Canadian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (SOGC, 2024) have revised the management of pregnancy in Rh negative patients. In line with these recommendations, blood type and Rh determination is part of the recommended early pregnancy screening, ideally at the first antenatal visit. In non-immunized Rh-negative pregnant women with an Rh-positive partner, a non-invasive prenatal test can be recommended: Rh determination based on fetal acellular deoxyribonucleic acid present in maternal blood. Routine administration of anti-RhD immunoglobulin prenatally (at 2834 weeks amenorrhea (SA) and postpartum (within 72 hours after delivery) to unimmunized patients with Rh-positive infants allows reduction of feto-maternal sensitization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".