Stable and Accurate Least Squares Radial Basis Function Approximations on Bounded Domains
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The computation of global radial basis function (RBF) approximations requires the solution of a linear system which, depending on the choice of RBF parameters, may be ill-conditioned. We study the stability and accuracy of approximation methods using the Gaussian RBF in all scaling regimes of the associated shape parameter. The approximation is based on discrete least squares with function samples on a bounded domain, using RBF centers both inside and outside the domain. This results in a rectangular linear system. We show for one-dimensional approximations that linear scaling of the shape parameter with the degrees of freedom is optimal, resulting in constant overlap between neighboring RBF's regardless of their number, and we propose an explicit suitable choice of the proportionality constant. We show numerically that highly accurate approximations to smooth functions can also be obtained on bounded domains in several dimensions, using a linear scaling with the degrees of freedom per dimension. We extend the least squares approach to a collocation-based method for the solution of elliptic boundary value problems and illustrate that the combination of centers outside the domain, oversampling, and optimal scaling can result in accuracy close to machine precision in spite of having to solve very ill-conditioned linear systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it