Evaluation of a Cohort-Based Healthy Aging With HIV Wellness Pilot Intervention: “People Aging and Thriving With HIV” in Colorado
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The aging population of people living with HIV (PLWH) face unique health and social challenges. We piloted a community-based wellness program, People Aging and Thriving with HIV (PATH2Wellness), aiming to improve health outcomes through physical activity, nutritional counseling, and social support within Colorado Health Network, a statewide AIDS service organization. Participants ages 50+ were recruited into three cohorts between September 2020 and December 2021. Weekly step counts and psychosocial measures were collected. Overall, while there were no statistically significant improvements in step count or secondary outcomes (including depression, social connectedness, self-reported physical function, and quality of life [all p ≥ .55]), participants noted a high level of satisfaction. Ongoing feedback led to modifications for program improvement; as such, PATH2Wellness shows promise in improving mental health and social connectedness, and findings underscore the importance of tailored programs for older PLWH, suggesting avenues for research and program development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".