MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405016886 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v10i1.2891

Adaptation to Climate Change and Technical Efficiency in Paddy Farming: A Case Study in Wayanad and Palakkad Districts, Kerala

2023· article· en· W4405016886 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Basheer K. K

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Economics and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptation (eye)AgricultureMathematicsClimate changeAgricultural engineeringAgricultural scienceEnvironmental scienceGeographyEcologyEngineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has consistently recognized the anthropogenic nature of climate change and its impact on global systems, particularly agriculture.Recognizing the vulnerability of the agricultural sector, organizations like the Food and Agriculture Organization and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change have emphasized the urgent need for sustainable agricultural practices to mitigate the adverse effects of climate change.This study investigates the link between farmers' adaptive capacity, technical efficiency, and overall agricultural sustainability.Using stochastic frontier analysis, the research examines data from 330 paddy farmers in Wayanad and Palakkad, two climate-vulnerable districts in Kerala, India.The findings reveal a strong positive correlation between climate adaptation practices, coping strategies, and the technical efficiency of paddy farming.However, the study also highlights that a lack of comprehensive coping strategies can hinder farmers' ability to effectively address climate change impacts.This underscores the crucial need to integrate both climate adaptation practices and coping strategies into farmlevel planning to enhance the long-term sustainability of agriculture in the face of a changing climate

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.281
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.018 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicAgricultural Economics and PracticesFrench-language works237,207