Nouns of Religious Semantics Ending in -tel in the Russian Language of the 18th — the First Quarter of the 19th Century (Based on Lexicographic Works of the Civil Press)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The novelty of the study consists in addressing the consideration of the historical aspect of the issue of the system of names of persons in the Russian language using the example of nouns of religious semantics ending in -tel, registered in domestic dictionaries of the civil press of the 18th — first quarter of the 19th century. In the course of a comprehensive language analysis, it was established that the substantives of religious semantics ending in -tel form a special layer of confessional vocabulary with specific and non-specific meanings, serving as one of the productive means for the embodiment of the Orthodox worldview in the Russian language of the 18th — first quarter of the 19th century. It is shown that the substantives of religious semantics ending in -tel are mostly monosemantic concrete agents formed from infinitive stems of the fifth productive class and denoting, on the one hand, a supernatural being that has, according to Christian ideas, a personal origin, and on the other hand, a person.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".