Data-Driven Fault Recovery With Software-Defined Smart Transmission Grids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a Software-Defined Transmission Grid (SDTG) framework, integrated with digital and cyber-physical systems, to enable data-driven control within a smart transmission grid. The framework aims to improve grid reliability and accelerate fault recovery. We utilized the Schur complement network reduction technique in the digital model of SDTG to improve grid control through data-driven strategies, with a specific emphasis on rapid system fault recovery. Mathematical proofs based on classic circuit and algebraic graph theories were presented to confirm the effectiveness of the reduced network. Additionally, we introduced a data-driven optimal control approach and demonstrated that the optimal control input can be obtained from a finite set of past control signals, even in the absence of explicit knowledge regarding fault types or the grid’s dynamic response. The proposed methodology enhances grid management and offers a flexible and scalable framework for post-fault operation and grid restoration, serving as a foundational approach in other complex transmission grid management scenarios. The effectiveness of this approach was validated through numerical case studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".