L’enseignement du cinéma dans les écoles secondaires québécoises : portrait d’un curriculum enseigné inspiré des arts plastiques et de la littérature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cette étude à méthodologie mixte menée auprès de 89 enseignant⋅e⋅s est de brosser le portrait de l’enseignement du cinéma dans les écoles secondaires du Québec. Les résultats montrent que le cinéma est principalement enseigné dans les cours d’Arts plastiques et multimédia, de français et d’appellations diverses ayant un lien direct avec le cinéma. Deux profils se dégagent, soit celui de l’enseignant⋅e d’arts plastiques, faisant principalement des projets pratiques, et celui de français, faisant plutôt de l’analyse filmique. L’analyse permet de conclure que le curriculum enseigné du cinéma se base sur les quelques mentions du cinéma dans le curriculum formel (PFEQ), mais que le manque d’autonomisation du cinéma dans celui-ci engendre des difficultés d’ordre didactique généralisées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".