MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405025734 · doi:10.21810/jicw.v7i2.6734

The Inextricable Relationship Between Nuclear Energy and the Bomb

2024· article· en· W4405025734 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M.V. Ramana

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Intelligence Conflict and Warfare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclear weaponNuclear technologyPresentation (obstetrics)Energy (signal processing)Political scienceNuclear powerNuclear physicsPhysicsLawMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr. Ramana’s presentation focused on issues of nuclear energy, the risks it poses, the factors that make it unsuitable as a source of clean energy across the world, such as the challenge of disposing nuclear waste in a safe and sustainable manner, and the links the technology has to nuclear weapons and proliferation. Dr. Ramana spoke to the probability of states with nuclear energy capabilities pursuing a weapons program with ease, emphasizing the significant overlap between the technology used for nuclear weapons and energy. Received: 09-01-2024 Revised: 09-07-2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Intelligence Conflict and WarfareSame topicNuclear and radioactivity studiesFrench-language works237,207