Assessment of Historical and Future Mean and Extreme Precipitation Over Sub‐Saharan Africa Using <scp>NEX</scp>‐<scp>GDDP</scp>‐<scp>CMIP6</scp>: Part I—Evaluation of Historical Simulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study assesses the performance of 28 NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Climate Projections (NEX‐GDDP‐CMIP6) models and their multi‐model ensemble (MME) in simulating mean and extreme precipitation across sub‐Saharan Africa from 1985 to 2014. The Multi‐Source Weighted‐Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP) and Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station Data (CHIRPS) are used as reference datasets. Various statistical metrics such as the mean bias (MB), spatial correlation coefficients (SCCs), Taylor skill scores (TSS) and comprehensive ranking index (CRI) are employed to evaluate the performance of NEX‐GDDP‐CMIP6 models at both annual and seasonal scales. Results show that the NEX‐GDDP‐CMIP6 can reproduce the observed annual precipitation cycle in all the subregions, with the model spread within observational uncertainties. The MME also successfully reproduces the spatial distribution of mean precipitation, achieving SCCs and TSSs greater than 0.8 across all subregions. The biases in mean precipitation are consistent across different reference datasets. However, most of the NEX‐GDDP‐CMIP6 models show trends of mean precipitation opposite to observations. While the MME can generally reproduce the spatial distribution of extreme precipitation, its performance varies with the reference dataset, particularly for the number of rainy days (RR1) and maximum consecutive dry days (CDD). TSS values for extreme precipitation indices differ significantly by region, reference data and index, with the lowest values over South Central Africa and the highest over West Southern Africa. The CRI indicates that no single model consistently outperforms others across all subregions, even within the same region, when compared to both MSWEP and CHIRPS. These results may be helpful when using NEX‐GDDP‐CMIP6 models for future projections and impact assessment studies in sub‐Saharan Africa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".