MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405038833 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-199281

Preliminary Results of a Phase 1, Dose-Escalation Study of PRT2527, a Potent and Highly Selective CDK9 Inhibitor, As Monotherapy and in Combination with Zanubrutinib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoid Malignancies

2024· article· en· W4405038833 on OpenAlexaff
Katharine L. Lewis, Wojciech Jurczak, Gareth P. Gregory, Constantine S. Tam, Won Seog Kim, Eliza A. Hawkes, Franck Morschhauser, Sarit Assouline, Geoffrey Shouse, Petra Langerbeins, Monica Tani, Young Rok, Bruce D. Cheson, Catherine Diefenbach, Craig A. Portell, Jennifer Xavier, Muhtarjan Osman, Siminder Atwal, Wan‐Jen Hong, Clémentine Sarkozy

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersMorphoSysSwedish Orphan BiovitrumIncyteBeiGeneGilead SciencesMerck KGaAGenentechMEI PharmaNYU Grossman School of MedicineRegeneron PharmaceuticalsSeagenAstraZenecaEli Lilly and CompanyAmgen
KeywordsRefractory (planetary science)MedicineSalvage therapyIbrutinibInternal medicineMaximum tolerated doseOncologyAdverse effectChemotherapyLeukemiaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9), a key regulator of transcription elongation, is a potential target in transcriptionally addicted cancers dependent on oncogenic drivers with short half-lives such as MYC, MYB, and MCL1. PRT2527, an investigational, potent, and highly selective CDK9 inhibitor, is being developed for select relapsed/refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies as monotherapy and in combination (combo) with targeted agents. Zanubrutinib (zanu) is a Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor that upregulates BCL2 modifying factor (BMF), a proapoptotic molecule physiologically inhibited by BCL2, BCLXL, and BCLW (Kong, et al. ChemMedChem. 2018). The combo of CDK9 and BTK inhibition may lead to a synergistic effect by enhancing apoptotic priming and shifting dependency toward the CDK9 targets, MCL1 and BFL1. Methods: PRT2527-02 is a phase 1, multicenter, dose-escalation and dose-confirmation study evaluating safety and preliminary efficacy of PRT2527 as monotherapy and in combo with standard-dose zanu in patients (pts) with select R/R hematologic malignancies (NCT05665530). Pts must have relapsed or be refractory to or ineligible for standard-of-care therapy. PRT2527 was administered intravenously in escalating doses as a once weekly infusion, and zanu was administered orally. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose escalation decisions were guided by the Bayesian optimal interval design method based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1. Primary endpoints include safety, tolerability, DLTs, and recommended phase 2 dose of PRT2527 monotherapy and in combo with zanu. Secondary and exploratory endpoints include overall response rate and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of PRT2527 monotherapy and in combo with zanu. Results: As of June 21, 2024, 31 pts (17 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL] not otherwise specified, 7 peripheral T-cell lymphoma [PTCL], 2 high-grade B-cell lymphoma, 2 mantle cell lymphoma [MCL], 2 chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL], and 1 Richter syndrome) were enrolled and treated with PRT2527. Median age was 64 (range, 27-94) years, 61% were male, and median prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 1-7). Nineteen pts were treated with PRT2527 monotherapy (9 mg/m2, n=6; 15 mg/m2, n=5; 18 mg/m2, n=8) and 12 with PRT2527 and zanu combo (9 mg/m2, n=6; 15 mg/m2, n=6). Median duration of study treatment was 3.6 weeks (range, 0.7-30.4) for monotherapy and 6.8 weeks (range, 1.3-20.4) for combo. Most frequently reported (>20%) any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were neutropenia (53%), nausea (53%), and constipation (21%) with monotherapy and neutropenia, diarrhea, asthenia, hypokalemia, and vomiting (25% each) with combo. Overall, grade 3/4 TEAEs occurred in 18 (58%) pts, most frequently neutropenia (39%). Nine (29%) pts had a TEAE leading to dose hold: 6 (19%) due to grade 3/4 neutropenia that resolved with growth factor. No clinical tumor lysis syndrome was observed, and no DLTs were reported. Three pts achieved a response: a complete response in 1 non-GCB double-expressor DLBCL pt post-CAR T-cell therapy on monotherapy (9 mg/m2) and 1 MCL pt on combo (9 mg/m2), and a partial response in 1 PTCL pt on monotherapy (9 mg/m2). Eleven pts were on study and have not reached the first response assessment. Additional responders across tumor types have been seen after the data cut-off and will be presented. Fourteen (45%) pts remain on study (monotherapy [n=7], combo [n=7]), and 17 (55%) pts discontinued treatment: 14 (45%) due to PD, 2 (6%) due to TEAEs (supraventricular tachycardia [n=1], AML [n=1]), and 1 (3%) due to death (COVID-19). Whole blood expression of the CDK9 transcriptional targets MCL1 and MYC demonstrated target engagement at all dose levels, with a more prolonged transcriptional decrease at higher doses. At 18 mg/m2 (n=7), a median decrease of 80.5% in MCL1 and 82.4% in MYC messenger RNA (mRNA) was achieved 2 hours after the start of infusion. By 6 hours, median MCL1 mRNA returned to baseline levels while MYC levels remained suppressed with a median inhibition of 32.1%. Conclusions: PRT2527 as monotherapy and in combo with zanu had an acceptable safety profile and evidence of preliminary activity in pts with R/R lymphoid malignancies. Neutropenia was the most common TEAE, manageable with growth factor support. Dose finding with PRT2527 as monotherapy or in combo with zanu is ongoing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207