MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405039364 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-202138

Health-Related Communication in Adolescents and Young Adults with Sickle Cell Disease

2024· article· en· W4405039364 on OpenAlexaff
Tori Langmuir, Guolian Kang, Doralina L. Anghelescu, Jason Hodges, Jerlym S. Porter, Keesha Powell-Roach, Jane S. Hankins, Parul Rai, Clifford M. Takemoto, Nicole M. Alberts

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseMedicineSickle cell anemiaYoung adultPediatricsGerontologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic condition with multiple acute and chronic health complications, including pain, stroke, and organ damage. Health-related communication between patients, and both others (e.g., family members) and healthcare providers plays an important role in pain and disease management. High quality health-related communication is particularly vital for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) as they navigate managing increased disease burden and the transition from pediatric to adult care. However, little is known about the quality and associated risk factors for communication difficulties among AYAs with SCD. This study aimed to examine: 1) the quality of health-related communication among AYAs and 2) associations between health-related communication and sociodemographic, disease, pain, and psychological factors. Methods: AYAs with SCD (N=417; mean [M] age=18.7 years, range=13.2-29.3, 50% female, 100% Black, 65% Hb SS/Sβ0 - thalassemia genotype, 60% received hydroxyurea) enrolled in the Sickle Cell Clinical Research and Intervention Program (SCCRIP; NCT02098863) completed study procedures. Within this sample, AYAs completed 6 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0=never, 1=almost never, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=almost always) from the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Sickle Cell Disease Module (PedsQL-SCD) Communication I and II subscales, which assessed health-related communication (e.g., difficulties asking doctors and nurses questions, difficulties telling others when in pain). Patients also completed items on the PedsQL-SCD that assessed SCD-related worry (9-items), low mood (1-item), general anxiety (1-item), pain (Pain and Hurt subscale), and pain interference (Pain Impact subscale). Response scales of items from the PedsQL-SCD were converted to a 100-point scale and transformed, such that higher scores indicated better communication (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0). Demographic, treatment-related, and diagnostic factors were obtained from the SCCRIP database. To examine health-related communication, we calculated the average response across all items within subscales Communication I and II of the PedsQL-SCD. Subscale scores were combined to create an overall measure of health-related communication with others and healthcare providers. Regression models adjusted for age were calculated to examine the effect of demographic, disease, treatment, and psychosocial factors on health-related communication. False discovery rate adjusted p-values (=q value) were calculated to account for multiple comparisons. Results: The mean level of overall health-related communication among AYAs was 71.0 (standard deviation [SD]=22.6). The mean average response on health-related communication items was comparable for adolescents (M=72.3, SD=23.0) and young adults (M=68.4, SD=21.7). Regarding specific areas of communication, the most common communication difficulty amongst the overall sample was “It is hard for me when others do not understand how much pain I feel,” with 27% of AYAs reporting this communication difficulty occurred often or almost always (i.e., score ≤25 on the item) in the past month. In addition, a greater number of young adults than adolescents reported often or almost always on this item (33.5% vs. 23.0%, p=.027). Among all AYAs, increased communication difficulties were associated with male sex (β=9.1), Hb SS/Sβ0 genotype (β=5.4), elevated disease-related worry (β=0.66), elevated general worry (β=0.27), low mood (β=0.37), pain (β=0.47), and pain interference (β=0.48) (ps ranging from <.001 to .02) at q<.05. Conclusion: The current study is the first, to our knowledge, to examine health-related communication specifically in AYAs with SCD. Male sex, Hb SS/Sβ0 genotype, psychological factors (e.g., worry, low mood) as well as increased pain and pain interference were associated with increased difficulties with health-related communication. These findings indicate a substantial proportion of AYAs with SCD experience difficulties with pain communication, potentially creating additional barriers to optimal care. Health-related communication, and in particular pain communication, should be routinely assessed among AYAs with SCD and intervened upon within the context of their relationships with healthcare providers and important others (e.g., caregivers, friends).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders→French-language works237,207→