MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405041955 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-203960

Examining the Clinical Relevance of the AML Plasma Metabolome

2024· article· en· W4405041955 on OpenAlexaff
Cristiana O’Brien, Nirvana Nursimulu, Rachel Culp‐Hill, Julie Haines, Andrea Arruda, Mark D. Minden, Angelo D’Alessandro, Sushant Kumar, Kristin J. Hope, Courtney L. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetabolomeMedicineInternal medicineMetabolite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite advances in cancer research, outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain poor due to the heterogeneous nature of the disease (Kantarjian et al, 2021). Variations in mutations correspond to unique metabolic states (Simonetti et al, 2021) which are responsible in part for mediating variability in therapy response and relapse biology (Jones et al, 2018, 2020). To fully unravel patient heterogeneity, it is necessary to understand the metabolic changes across AML subtypes. Previous research has demonstrated the impact of clinical features on their circulating metabolome (Bar et al, 2020). However, a comprehensive survey of circulating lipids and metabolites has not yet been undertaken in AML. Therefore, we examined the predictive power of the circulating plasma lipidome in AML patients. We quantified the circulating metabolism from 231 patients at diagnosis. Annotation of 88 clinical features was performed for all patients, including: age, sex, blood count characteristics, mutational status, ELN risk score, cytogenetics, therapy response, relapse status, and overall survival (OS). Metabolite levels in each plasma sample was interrogated by mass spectrometry, identifying 177 metabolites, and 1988 lipids. Metabolites and metabolic pathways were analyzed using MetaboAnalystR. Of the 88 features assessed, 35 had significant associations with specific metabolites and/or lipids. Further, 28 of the 66 AML mutations analyzed also had distinct metabolites and/or lipids associated with it, as well as distinct pathway enrichment and lipid structures. Some of these findings align with known AML biology such as an increase in glutamate metabolism in FLT3-ITD mutant samples (Gregory et al, 2016), representing the usefulness of this resource for future studies. Predicting outcomes and therapy response in AML is continually evolving to account for patient heterogeneity. Given that metabolites and lipids can help describe heterogeneous patient features, we next assessed the ability of lipids and metabolites to predict OS by Cox regression models. Both were found to be associated with OS, with top lipids (C-index=0.590) having a stronger association over top metabolites (C-index=0.577). Notably, lipids demonstrated a predictive capacity comparable to the current clinical standard, ELN score (C-index=0.666), suggesting that lipids could serve as an alternative predictor for OS. We next analyzed whether individual lipids or metabolites can be predictive of therapy response. Selecting the best treatment for patients upfront can reduce the burden on patients as well as the healthcare system. Thus, predicting response to chemotherapy at diagnosis can be of clinical use. Using orthogonal partial least squares - discriminant analysis we found that plasma lipid levels significantly separated patients that achieved a complete response compared to patients that did not achieve a clinical remission post chemotherapy treatment. Further, only lipids were found to be predictive of therapy response with the top features including cardiolipins, and phospholipids, highlighting the importance of lipid metabolism on AML outcomes. Based on lipids' predictive power, we tested the capability of the lipidomics data to predict therapy response in a clinically meaningful capacity. We built machine learning models for the response to therapy lipidomic data, with, and without clinical features (age, cytogenetic risk, white blood cell count, AML diagnosis), as well as clinical features alone. The data was split into training and testing sets (80%/20%) and feature selection was performed by removing correlated features. Four machine learning models were tested by nested cross-validation (CV): ExtraTreesClassifier (ETC), RandomForestClassifier, XGBoost, and support vector machine. The best model was selected based on the CV score, followed by hyperparameter tuning. The lipidomics data demonstrated exceptional performance using ETC on test data to predict therapy response. Lipids alone and lipids with clinical features performed nearly identically (AUCs 0.95 and 0.96), surpassing the performance of clinical features alone (AUC 0.56), suggesting that lipids could be prospective biomarkers for therapy response. Together, these data demonstrate that the circulating metabolome can stratify heterogenous AML patient populations and predict outcomes in AML.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchFrench-language works237,207