Nemtabrutinib, a Noncovalent Reversible BTK Inhibitor in Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Results from the Phase 2 Bellwave-003 Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have demonstrated monotherapy activity in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL), although response rates and progression free survival (PFS) have been limited. Nemtabrutinib is a once daily, potent, noncovalent, reversible BTKi with a distinct kinase profile, inhibiting BTK and other B-cell receptor relevant kinases. Here, we present the safety and efficacy results from the phase 2 BELLWAVE-003 study (NCT04728893) of nemtabrutinib at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in participants (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) FL. Methods: The multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase 2 BELLWAVE-003 study enrolled pts with R/R CLL/SLL, Richter transformation, mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, FL, and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. Pts with R/R FL received nemtabrutinib at RP2D of 65 mg once daily until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by investigator assessment according to Lugano 2014 criteria. Additional endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability. The data cut-off date was April 19, 2024. Results: At data cut-off, 36 pts with R/R FL treated at RP2D were enrolled. The median (range) follow-up was 6.1 mo (0.2-13.9). These pts had a median age of 58 years (range 33-78), 18 (50%) were female. At enrollment, 2 (6%) pts had Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score of 0-1 (low), 12 (33%) had FLIPI score 2 (intermediate), and 22 (61%) had FLIPI score 3-5 (high); 33 (92%) pts had Lugano stage III/IV disease The median (range) number of prior lines of therapy was 4 (1-11). All pts had prior chemoimmunotherapy, 32 (89%) had prior lenalidomide, and 11 (31%) had prior PI3K inhibitor. The median (range) time on therapy was 2.8 mo (0.03-9.5), with 16 (44%) pts on therapy at data cut-off. Among 29 efficacy evaluable pts, the ORR was 41% (95% CI, 24-61), including 1 (3%) with CR and 11 (38%) with PR; 6 (21%) pts had stable disease. The median (range) DOR was 5.8 mo (1.5-not reached [NR]) with median (range) time to response of 2.8 mo (range 2.6-5.4). Median PFS in the as treated population was 5.5 mo (95% CI, 2.8-NR). Median OS was NR (95% CI, 10.4-NR), with 6-mo OS rate of 100%. Any-grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 31 (86%) pts, most commonly neutropenia in 10 (28%) pts, decreased platelet count (8 [22%], and anemia (7 [19%]). Grade 3-4 AEs occurred in 13 (36%) pts, with grade 3-4 decreased platelet count in 3 (8%) pts, thrombocytopenia in 3 (8%) pts, neutropenia in 3 (8%) pts, and anemia in 2 (6%) pts. No atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmia was observed. Dose reductions due to an AE occurred in 1 (3%) pt (sepsis), and discontinuation due to an AE in 3 (8%) pts (thrombocytopenia, drug related toxicity, urticaria). There were no deaths due to an AE. Conclusion: Nemtabrutinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity in a heavily refractory population of pts with FL post chemoimmunotherapy and immunomodulatory therapy. Nemtabrutinib was well tolerated, and no new safety signals were identified. Enrollment and follow-up are ongoing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".