MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405042336 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-199506

Danicopan As Add-on Therapy to Ravulizumab or Eculizumab in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes from the Phase 3 ALPHA Trial

2024· article· en· W4405042336 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline Piatek, Jong Wook Lee, Morag Griffin, J Nishimura, Christopher J. Patriquin, Hubert Schrezenmeier, Wilma Barcellini, Jamile M. Shammo, Anna Gayà, Mohammed H. Mahdi, Peng Liu, Karl-Johan Myrén, Andrew Messali, Flore Sicre de Fontbrune, Jens Panse, Austin Kulasekararaj

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuriaEculizumabMedicineHemoglobinuriaPediatricsImmunologyInternal medicineAnemiaAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background In patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), the complement C5 inhibitors (C5i) ravulizumab and eculizumab have proven efficacy and safety; ravulizumab provides immediate, complete and sustained inhibition of terminal complement activity, resulting in control of intravascular hemolysis and improved clinical outcomes. Approximately 20% of patients on C5i experience ongoing anemia caused by clinically significant extravascular hemolysis (csEVH). Danicopan is a first-in-class oral factor D inhibitor that targets the alternative pathway of the complement system. In the phase 3 ALPHA trial (NCT04469465), danicopan add-on therapy to ravulizumab or eculizumab demonstrated significant improvements in clinical outcomes in patients with PNH and csEVH. Objective To present final long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the ALPHA trial. Methods Patients in this phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial were aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of PNH, csEVH (hemoglobin ≤ 9.5 g/dL, absolute reticulocyte count ≥ 120 x 109/L), and ≥ 6 months' treatment with ravulizumab or eculizumab. At week 0, patients were randomized 2:1 to danicopan or placebo add-on therapy for 12 weeks; from week 12, patients in the placebo arm switched to danicopan. From week 24, patients continued to receive danicopan for up to 2 years in a long-term extension (LTE). PROs are reported over time, including Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and EQ-5D-3L. Results In total, 86 patients were randomized to danicopan (n = 57) or placebo (n = 29); of these, 54 and 26 patients, respectively, completed the study up to week 24; and 46 and 24 patients, respectively, completed the LTE. Baseline characteristics were similar between arms. In patients receiving danicopan, mean (standard deviation [SD]) FACIT-F scores improved from 34.0 (11.3) at baseline to 42.1 (7.7) at week 12, which was close to the general population score of 43.6; improvements were maintained to weeks 24 (40.9 [9.7]) and 72 (40.3 [10.3]). In the placebo-danicopan arm, improvements in FACIT- F were seen at week 24 and maintained to week 72, with a mean (SD) score of 31.7 (11.0) at baseline and 35.4 (10.7), 37.7 (11.5), and 36.7 (11.2) at weeks 12, 24, and 72, respectively. At week 12, change from baseline was significantly greater for danicopan vs placebo in the double-blinded phase (least-squares mean [95% confidence interval]: 8.13 [6.30, 9.96] vs 2.53 [−0.22, 4.91], respectively; p = 0.0004). EORTC global health status/quality of life (QoL) mean (SD) scores in the danicopan arm improved from 58.3 (20.2) at baseline to 69.9 (18.8), 68.9 (19.4), and 68.3 (17.9) at weeks 12, 24, and 72, respectively, close to the general population norm of 66.1; in the placebo-danicopan arm scores improved from 53.1 (17.9) at baseline to 62.3 (17.0), 64.5 (19.1), and 62.5 (19.3), respectively. Mean (SD) EORTC physical functioning scores in the danicopan arm increased from 73.3 (18.8) at baseline to 85.1 (15.3), 85.9 (14.8), and 83.3 (16.7) at weeks 12, 24, and 72, close to the population norm of 85.1; in the placebo-danicopan arm, scores increased from 64.0 (20.3) at baseline to 66.1 (20.5), 77.0 (21.4), and 74.7 (22.1), respectively. EORTC fatigue subscale scores in the danicopan arm improved from 43.3 (27.2) at baseline to 27.4 (20.3), 25.4 (23.6), and 27.8 (22.2) at weeks 12, 24, and 72, comparable with the general population norm (29.5); in the placebo-danicopan arm scores improved from 49.0 (25.8) at baseline to 47.1 (28.6), 37.5 (27.8), and 44.9 (24.2), respectively. Mean EQ-5D-3L scores (US Health State Index) were slightly below general population values (0.86-0.96) at baseline in the danicopan (0.84) and placebo arms (0.79) and remained stable with small numerical improvements at weeks 12, 24, and 72 (danicopan: 0.90, 0.91, and 0.87; placebo-danicopan: 0.86, 0.85, and 0.84, respectively). Conclusions In patients with PNH and csEVH, long-term danicopan add-on therapy to ravulizumab or eculizumab resulted in sustained improvements in patient-reported fatigue, QoL and physical function for up to 72 weeks, with scores reaching those in the general population. These findings indicate that danicopan add-on therapy is a potential solution for improving QoL in patients with PNH and severe csEVH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207