Elevated brain pulsations in depression: insights from a pooled ultrasound cohort study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Excessive brain tissue pulsations (BTP), measured by ultrasound, have been associated with depression and are hypothesized to contribute to brain damage in this population at risk for cerebrovascular lesions. However, previous research has been limited by small sample sizes. To address this issue, our study pooled data from three separate investigations, resulting in the largest cohort of depressed participants with BTP measurements to date. We analysed 123 participants (74 individuals with depression and 49 healthy controls) using ultrasound tissue pulsatility imaging (TPI) to assess resting BTP. Results showed that both MeanBTP and MaxBTP were significantly associated with depression, as determined by multiple linear regression models that included age, sex and blood pressure as covariates. Additionally, we found that age, sex and diastolic blood pressure were significant predictors of BTP. Specifically, BTP decreased with age, was higher in men, and was more strongly predicted by diastolic blood pressure than by systolic blood pressure. In this large cohort, we replicated the association between depression and increased BTP, supporting the notion that elevated BTP may be a potential mechanism underlying brain damage over time. Our findings suggest that TPI could serve as a valuable surrogate marker for brain health in clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it