MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405043067 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-199164

Ferric Derisomaltose Versus Iron Sucrose in Pregnancy (FLIP): A Retrospective Observational Study on Outpatient Intravenous Iron Infusion Capacity

2024· article· en· W4405043067 on OpenAlexaff
Mary E. Morgan, Yulia Lin, Julia Lou, Anne McLeod, Nadine Shehata, Noor Niyar N. Ladhani, Kristine Matusiak, Heather VanderMeulen

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoHealth Sciences CentreMount Sinai HospitalSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIron sucroseIntravenous ironObservational studyMedicineRetrospective cohort studyPregnancyIron deficiencyInternal medicineAnemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a widespread condition in pregnancy and is associated with preterm delivery, low birth weight, and impaired cognitive development. Adequate oral iron repletion is challenging in pregnancy due to increased iron demands and vulnerability to gastrointestinal upset. Individuals with intolerance or inadequate response to oral iron, severe IDA, or less than 4 weeks to delivery are managed with intravenous (IV) iron during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. At our academic center, the treatment of pregnant patients with IV iron is limited by infusion clinic capacity. Most pregnant patients require 900-1000 mg of IV elemental iron. Administering this dose requires three infusions of iron sucrose (IS) or a single infusion of ferric derisomaltose (FDI). We hypothesized that the use of FDI would increase capacity to administer IV iron to pregnant patients compared to IS. Methods: Our center is a high-risk obstetrical and academic teaching hospital performing approximately 4,500 deliveries annually. In June 2022, FDI was added to IS as an IV iron treatment option for IDA in pregnancy, with its formal implementation adopted in August 2023. According to institutional policy, IS is given as 300 mg over 2 hours and FDI as 500 mg over 30 minutes or 1000 mg over 1 hour. Fetal monitoring is not routinely performed during infusions. This retrospective observational study compared all pregnant patients 18 years and older treated with at least one dose of IV iron (IS or FDI) at our obstetrics infusion clinic between June 2021 and February 2024. Patients with incomplete records were excluded. The primary outcome was the total number of unique patients treated with outpatient IV iron (IS or FDI) per month in the obstetrics infusion clinic during baseline Period 1 (June 2021 to May 2022), Period 2 when FDI was available (June 2022 to July 2023), and Period 3 when the formal policy was implemented (August 2023 to February 2024). Secondary outcomes compared IS vs. FDI for the following metrics: infusion time per visit, mean number of visits per patient per pregnancy, total infusion time per patient per pregnancy, total dose of IV iron infused prior to delivery, treatment completion rate (all infusions ordered were infused; yes vs. no), and adverse reactions. Patients were identified using OBTV, the hospital database for pregnant patients, and assessed for eligibility. Patient charts were reviewed for demographics and laboratory data, and nursing records for infusion details. For patients without an assigned procedure duration, 60/30 minutes was assumed for 1000 mg/500 mg FDI and 120 minutes for 300 mg IS as per the institutional policy. This study was approved by the institutional research ethics board. Descriptive analyses were summarized by mean and standard deviation. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: During the study period, 327 patients received IS and 187 patients received FDI. The implementation of FDI increased the mean number (±SD) of patients treated per month with IV iron from 20.1±4.5 in Period 1 to 20.9±4.4 in Period 2 to 30.7±6.3 in Period 3 (p<0.0001: Period 1&2 vs. Period 3). Compared to IS, FDI reduced the mean IV iron infusion time per visit (113±9 vs. 65±10 minutes; p<0.0001), the mean number of visits per patient (2.2±0.8 vs. 1.0±0.1; p<0.0001), and the mean total IV iron infusion time per patient per pregnancy (252±92 vs. 65±10 minutes; p<0.0001). The mean total dose of IV iron infused prior to delivery was 679±246 mg for IS vs. 987±81 mg for FDI (p<0.0001). The course completion rate was 83% for IS and 99% for FDI (p<0.0001). Adverse reactions occurred in 42 (13.0%) patients who received IS and 10 patients (5.4%) who received FDI; most were mild, with only one patient treated with IS being sent to triage for further assessment. Conclusion: Using FDI in pregnancy enhanced the capacity and efficiency of the IV iron infusion clinic by treating more patients per month, reducing infusion times, and limiting the number of visits required. This initiative improves the quality of care by optimizing maternal and fetal health outcomes associated with correcting iron deficiency anemia and reducing the burden of multiple visits that disproportionately affect those of low socioeconomic status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicIron Metabolism and Disorders→French-language works237,207→