MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405043921 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-210872

Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm (BPDCN) International Registry: Tagraxofusp Cohort Treatment Results

2024· article· en· W4405043921 on OpenAlexaffabout
Astghik Voskanyan, Marina Konopleva, Maria Badikyan, Alvaro J. Alencar, Arusyak Ivanyan, Carolyn Owen, Consolato Sergi, Ching‐Tien Peng, Dickran Kazandjian, Daniel Coriu, Funda Tekkeşin, Justin Taylor, Hasanein H. Ghali, Hasmik Maghaqyan, Karen Bedirian, Maria Paola Martelli, Enrico Attardi, Maria Teresa Voso, Mariam Abramashvili, Mazin Faisal Al‐Jadiry, Min‐Yu Su, Maria Camelia Stancioaica, Nare Martirosyan, Nerses Ghahramanyan, Nino Totogashvili, Najla H. Al Ali, Pavel P Kotoucek, Rejin Kebudi, Robin Ohannessian, Ruzanna Papyan, Shushan Hovsepyan, Shefali Mehra, Salma Elashwah, Sameer Bakhshi, Samvel Bardakhchyan, Samvel Danelyan, Shaimaa El‐Ashwah, M. Tezer Kutluk, Ahmad Alhuraiji, Deniz Tuğcu, Gevorg Tamamyan, Naveen Pemmaraju, Rami S. Komrokji

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of OttawaFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCohortInternal medicineHematologic NeoplasmsOncologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is an orphan malignancy defined by the WHO as affection fewer than 65 per 100,000 people and by the U.S. FDA as affecting less than 200,000 people in the U.S.. The BPDCN international registry was launched in July 2022 with the aim to create a large database for this rare disease, to generate data-driven diagnostic and treatment recommendations, and provide real-world evidence. Aim:The aim of this abstract is to evaluate the outcomes of BPDCN patients treated with tagraxofusp, an immunotoxin targeting CD123 that was approved by the U.S. FDA in December 2018 and the European EMA in January 2021 for the treatment of BPDCN. Methods: The registry collects retrospective and prospective data of patients diagnosed with BPDCN after January 1st, 2010. We assessed baseline characteristics, response to treatment and outcomes of BPDCN patients who received tagraxofusp. Results: As of June 2024, 70 patients from 13 countries (USA, Egypt, Canada, Italy, Georgia, Turkey, UK, India, Armenia, Iraq, Kuwait, Cyprus and Romania) were included in the registry. Among those, 22 patients (from USA, UK and Italy) have received treatment with tagraxofusp. Seventeen patients were treated with tagraxofusp as a first line therapy and 5 patients as a second line. The median age was 76years (range 40-87) with only one female patient. Fifteen patients had received tagraxofusp before the U.S. FDA approval in the setting of clinical trials. In the first line therapy setting, the overall response rate was 82% (14/17 patients) where 9 patients had a complete response (CR), 5 pts partial response (PR), 2 stable disease (SD), and one patient was not evaluable(no information was available). Of the 9 CR patients, 2 passed away from other reasons besides BPDCN, one was lost to follow up, the other 6 relapsed. Median time to relapse was 3 months. Among the relapsed patients, 4 experienced progressive or stable disease on subsequent chemotherapy regimens, 2 were treated with HyperCVAD followed allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) and were alive at last follow-up. Of the 7 patients with PR and SD as first line therapy, 6 experienced progressive disease, 1 patient who was treated with HyperCVAD followed by allo-SCT was alive at last follow-up. None of 5 patients treated with tagraxofusp as a second line therapy experienced CR, two patients experienced short SD, the other three progressive disease. At the last follow-up information was available for 19 of 22 patients of which 4 were alive. Conclusion: Tagraxofusp yields high response rates with more than 50% CR in the upfront setting; however, the relapse rates without allo-SCT remains high. This therapy is currently only available in selected countries and only 3 out of the 13 countries participating in this registry reported its use. The treatment strategy of BPDCN should be a total therapy approach incorporating novel agents like tagraxofusp with intrathecal chemotherapy and allo-SCT to prevent the relapse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders researchFrench-language works237,207