MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405044212 · doi:10.1016/j.rec.2024.11.006

Impact of intensive versus nonintensive antithrombotic treatment on device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure

2024· article· en· W4405044212 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Garot, Pedro Cepas‐Guillén, Eduardo Flores‐Umanzor, Nina Leduc, Vilhemas Bajoras, Nils Perrin, Angela McInerney, Ana Lafond, Julio I. Farjat‐Pasos, Xavier Millán, Sandra Zendjebil, Réda Ibrahim, Pablo Salinas, Ole De Backer, Ignacio Cruz‐González, Dabit Arzamendi, Laura Sanchís, Luis Nombela‐Franco, Gilles O’Hara, Adel Aminian, Jens Erik Nielsen‐Kudsk, Josep Rodés‐Cabau, Xavier Freixa

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Española de Cardiología (English Edition) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecMontreal Heart Institute
FundersNovo Nordisk Fonden
KeywordsAppendageAntithromboticMedicineThrombusCardiologyClosure (psychology)Internal medicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRevista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)Same topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207