MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405044297 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-198794

Utility of the Central Nervous System International Prognostic Index (CNS-IPI) in Patients with Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with Rituximab-Containing Chemoimmunotherapy

2024· article· en· W4405044297 on OpenAlexaff
Jiayu Yang, Anna Hayden, Diego Villa, Aixiang Jiang, Alina S. Gerrie, Christopher P. Venner, Pedro Farinha, David W. Scott, Laurie H. Sehn, Kerry J. Savage

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BCUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRituximabChemoimmunotherapyInternational Prognostic IndexInternal medicineDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaOncologyLymphoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is a rare, but devastating event in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). Historically, CNS recurrence occurred in ~2% of patients. However, large scale studies in the rituximab era have not been performed and there is limited information on specific risk factors. The CNS-international prognostic index (CNS-IPI) is a validated CNS risk model for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) incorporating 6 risk factors, including the standard IPI factors, in addition to renal and/or adrenal involvement. The CNS-IPI risk can identify a high-risk group (≥4 risk factors) with a CNS relapse risk of ≥10%. However, as a separate entity, PMBCL was not included. Methods: All patients (pts) age ≥18 years with a new clinico-pathological diagnosis of PMBCL, treated with curative intent rituximab (R)-containing chemoimmunotherapy, between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2022 were identified through the BC Cancer Centre for Lymphoid Cancer Database. The CNS-IPI, incorporating age (>60 years), stage (III/IV), ECOG performance status (PS) (≥2), number of extranodal sites (>1), elevated LDH, and renal/adrenal involvement, was determined to stratify pts into low risk (0-1 factors), intermediate risk (2-3 factors), and high risk (≥4 factors) groups. The cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was estimated using a competing risk analysis with the R package cmprsk, accounting for death from any cause as a competing event. Results: In total, 244 pts were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 36 years (range 17-84) and 136 (55.7%) were female. The median size of the anterior mediastinal mass was 11 cm (range 5-20 cm). By the CNS-IPI risk factors, 21 (8.6%) pts were age >60 years, 95 (38.9%) had stage III/IV disease, 87/236 (36.9%) had PS ≥2 (missing n=8), 83 (34.0%) had >1 extranodal site, 180/239 (75.3%) had an elevated LDH (missing n=5), and 13 (5.3%) patients had renal and/or adrenal involvement. The CNS-IPI for 233 pts with all factors available was: 0-1, n=95 (38.9%); 2-3, n=100 (41%); 4+ factors n=38 (15.6%). In total, 33 (13.5%) pts received dose adjusted (DA) EPOCH-R, and the remaining pts received R-CHOP, 8 of which had R-CHOP x 3/R-ICE x3 as part of a clinical trial. 69 (28.3%) pts received radiotherapy post systemic therapy. Three pts with renal/adrenal involvement had high dose methotrexate prophylaxis, 1 of whom also received intrathecal chemotherapy. With a median duration of follow up for alive pts of 91 months (range 5-263), 6 (2.5%) had a CNS relapse, with a median time to CNS relapse from diagnosis of 9.9 months (range 5.1-56.9) and 5-year (5 y) estimated cumulative incidence of CNS relapse of 2.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1%, 5.7%). Five pts with CNS relapse had isolated parenchymal involvement, 1 of whom developed systemic relapse later during CNS treatment, and the remaining pt had leptomeningeal disease concurrent with systemic relapse. The 5 y cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was 2.1% (95% CI 0.7%, 5.0%) and 6.8% (95% CI 1.1%, 19.8%) in the R-CHOP and DA-EPOCH-R treatment groups, respectively, p=0.075. By the CNS-IPI, 14.7% (31/211) of pts treated with R-CHOP, and 21.2% (7/33) of pts treated with DA-EPOCH-R were high-risk (p=0.337) and renal/kidney involvement occurred in 11/200 (5.5%) and 2/31 (6.4%), by treatment group respectively (p=0.84). The 5 y cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was 0%, 1.7% (95% CI 0.1%, 7.9%), and 13.2% (95% CI 4.7%, 26.0%) in the low, intermediate, and high-risk CNS-IPI groups, respectively (p<0.0001). Four of the cases with CNS relapse had renal/adrenal involvement at diagnosis, which translated into a 5 y cumulative incidence CNS recurrence risk of 30.8% (95% CI 8.7%, 57%) vs. 1.1% (95% CI 0.2%, 3.9%) (p<0.00001) for those with and without renal/adrenal involvement, respectively. Conclusion: The risk of CNS relapse in PMBCL is overall low and comparable to estimates reported in the pre-rituximab era, which likely reflects the poor penetrance of rituximab across the blood-brain barrier. Like in DLBCL, the CNS-IPI appears to stratify pts and identifies a high-risk group in PMBCL with a CNS relapse rate of approximately 10%. However, this appears to largely driven by renal/adrenal involvement, which represents a very high-risk site. These data provide a benchmark to compare the impact of ongoing studies incorporating PD1 inhibitors and other novel therapies in frontline therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→