MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405045282 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-201171

Spatially Resolved Single-Cell Transcriptomics of T Cells in Follicular Lymphoma Reveals Distinct Immune Ecosystems

2024· article· en· W4405045282 on OpenAlexaff
Yoshiaki Abe, Junko Zenkoh, Akinori Kanai, Daisuke Ikeda, Daisuke Kaji, Sawa Aya, Ryota Matsuoka, Kei Asayama, Rikako Tabata, Ryota Ishii, Manabu Fujisawa, Makishima Kenichi, Sakurako Suma, Yasuhito Suehara, Keiichiro Hattori, Tatsuhiro Sakamoto, Hidekazu Nishikii, Chikashi Yoshida, Hiroko Bando, Ayako Suzuki, Yasunori Ota, Yoshihito Otsuka, Daisuke Matsubara, Kosei Matsue, Shigeru Chiba, Christian Steidl, Yutaka Suzuki, Mamiko Sakata‐Yanagimoto

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BC
FundersChugai PharmaceuticalEisaiAstellas PharmaBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsTranscriptomeBiologyFollicular lymphomaStromal cellSingle-cell analysisLaser capture microdissectionImmune systemGene expression profilingCellMolecular biologyImmunologyLymphomaCancer researchGene expressionGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Recent studies have shown that the extent of T-cell infiltration strongly correlates with a low frequency of early relapse in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). This suggests that a deeper understanding of T-cell heterogeneity and biology could lead to the development of novel FL biomarkers. Our previous single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis (Abe et al. ASH 2023) revealed significant heterogeneity in T cells, particularly in follicular T cell components in FL. This study aimed to elucidate the spatial characteristics of T cells in FL, focusing on the follicular T cell subsets relevant to FL biology. Methods: We performed a spatially resolved single-cell transcriptomic analysis of six formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of newly diagnosed FL using the Xenium In Situ system. We used a custom gene panel comprising 289 genes curated from the differentially expressed genes detected in the scRNA-seq analysis of various immune and stromal cells in FL. After DAPI-based cell segmentation, single-cell transcriptome data were integrated and subjected to unsupervised clustering analysis to reproduce the results of the scRNA-seq analysis. The spatially smoothed chemokine gene density was calculated using the kernel-smoothing method. Multiplex digital spatial profiling (MDSP) was performed on 242 FL samples from three cohorts to validate the Xenium analysis findings. Results: We analyzed the transcriptome data from 516,657 cells detected using Xenium. Unsupervised clustering analysis detected T cell components, in addition to malignant (Bmalig) and non-malignant B cells, monocytes/dendritic cells, plasma cells, and stromal cells, including endothelial cells. Sub-clustering analysis detected T cell subsets annotated as lymphoma follicular regulatory (LTFR) and CD4 (LTFC4) or CD8 (LTFC8) lymphoma follicular cytotoxic T cells in our previous scRNA-seq analysis, as well as conventional T cell subsets, including follicular helper (TFH), regulatory (Treg), and cytotoxic (Tct) T cells. The transcriptional features of these subsets were consistent with their scRNA-seq profiles. Remarkably, the LTFR and LTFC cells were preferentially observed within and at the edges of neoplastic follicles (NFs), respectively. The minimum distance from LTFR cells to NFs or Bmalig cells was shorter than that from Treg cells.Similarly, compared to Tct cells, LTFC cells were localized closer to NFs or Bmalig cells. Additionally, compared to LTFC cells, LTFR cells tended to be closer to NFs or Bmalig cells. The spatially smoothed densities of CXCL13 and CCL19 were relatively high in the NFs and T-cell zones, respectively, as reported previously. We also confirmed that the CXCL13 and CCL19 densities were the highest at the coordinate points of TFH and naïve T cells, respectively. Among the non-TFH T cell populations, the highest CXCL13 and lowest CCL19 densities were detected at the coordinates of LTFR cells, whereas the joint density of CXCL13 and CCL19, which estimated their overlap, was the highest at LTFC cell positions, supporting the distribution patterns of these cell subsets. The spatial and distance relationships depicted using the MDSP echoed those suggested by the Xenium analysis. Correlation analysis of cell localization identified remarkably high correlations between LTFR and TFH cells and between LTFC4 and LTFC8 cells. Cellular neighborhood analysis revealed that LTFR and TFH cells formed distinct cellular neighborhoods, suggesting that LTFR cells specifically suppressed TFH cells activity. Additionally, the LTFC4 and LTFC8 cells formed neighborhoods, consistent with their biased distribution at the edge regions of the NFs. Literature-based upstream regulator and Xenium spatial gene density analyses suggested that interleukin-21 (IL-21) was the most relevant inducer of LTFR, LTFC4, and LTFC8 cells. Consistently, the phenotypes of these cells were reproduced in cell culture in the presence of IL-21, suggesting that the IL-21-predominant FL microenvironment, enriched with activated TFH cells, induced these non-TFH cell subsets and elicited anti-tumorigenic immunity. Conclusions: Our spatially resolved single-cell analysis of T cells revealed the presence and characteristic distribution patterns of distinct follicular T cell subsets in FL. This approach highlights the self-regulatory immune ecosystems that may underlie FL biology and clinical behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207