MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405046335 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-209372

Machine Learning Classification of Spatial Patterns of Malignant Cells Reveals Implications in Prognosis and Tumor Microenvironment Composition in Lymphoma

2024· article· en· W4405046335 on OpenAlexaff
Shruti Sridhar, Michał Marek Hoppe, Patrick Jaynes, Gayatri Kumar, Siddham Jasoria, Ziwei Meng, Yanfen Peng, Sanjay De Mel, Limei Poon, Esther Hian Li Chan, Wee Joo Chng, Soo‐Yong Tan, Susan Swee‐Shan Hue, Siok‐Bian Ng, Chandramouli Nagarajan, Nicholas F. Grigoropoulos, Shaoying Li, Joseph D. Khoury, Pedro Farinha, Anja Mottok, David W. Scott, Xiaofei Ye, Qiang Pan-Hammarström, Vaibhav Rajan, Kasthuri Kannan, Anand D. Jeyasekharan

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in cancer detection
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTumor microenvironmentLymphomaCancer researchMedicinePathologyBiologyTumor cells

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Malignancies exhibit variable cellular distribution patterns and the relationship between these topographic variations, underlying biological processes, and clinical outcomes remain poorly understood. Point process analyses, widely used in ecology, can elucidate the spatial distribution of points in complex systems but have rarely been applied to tumor heterogeneity. We recently demonstrated (Hoppe et al, Cancer Discovery 2023), that cells co-expressing high MYC and BCL2 but lacking BCL6 (M+2+6-), in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) are consistently correlated with poor survival compared to other MYC/BCL2/BCL6 combinations. Machine learning approaches can be applied to understand nuances of cellular point patterns and help with correlating with clinicopathological variables. Here, we developed a code frame that can be generalized across tissue regions accounting for heterogeneity to quantitatively study spatial patterns of M+2+6- cells in DLBCL. Methods We developed a scalable automated workflow for generating spatial point patterns. The individual steps of the pipeline have been consolidated into a standalone package that can be executed in a facile manner for any image type, without dependencies on any proprietary software. Using multiplexed fluorescent immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) in four cohorts of DLBCL (n=449), spatial point patterns were derived, and Geyer's point process model was applied. Machine learning classification models were benchmarked for spatial statistics derived from the point process model. A multi-omic analysis, including single-cell transcriptomic analyses of 22 DLBCL samples, was then conducted. Spatial transcriptomic technique, Stereoseq, was also conducted on 2 DLBCL samples. Results The workflow consists of the following parts: 1) The python script using the OpenCV package to manipulate the kernel size and intensity of the spatial coordinates overlaid on the images; 2) A QuPath groovy script to automate the import and export of the images and the parameter thresholds for the pixel classifier; 3) An R script to build the spatial point patterns from coordinates and save different oncogene co-expression as marks within the accurate geojson annotations; and 4) an R script to obtain measures of quality in terms of minimizing the number of points excluded while generating accurate spatial point pattern windows. After applying the pipeline, we see that patients could be divided into two: one group showed “clustered” spatial organization, while the other displayed a “dispersed” M+2+6- cell distribution. We achieved an accuracy of 98% in classifying patients as “dispersed” and “clustered” across four cohorts, through the random forest model. Cases with “dispersed” M+2+6- cells had shorter overall survival across all analyzed cohorts (P < 0.05 in 4/4 cohorts). Patients enriched in the “dispersed” phenotype, predominantly belonged to the ABC cell of origin subtype. We derived a “dispersed” pattern gene signature through multi-omic analyses which expressed genes implicated in cell migration and adhesion. Validation of the dispersed signature was conducted using Stereoseq, where M+2+6- cells enriched in the signature displayed greater values of L function across distances. Patients enriched in the dispersed phenotype displayed lower infiltration of immune subtypes though deconvolution hinting at a possible immunologically cold microenvironment. Conclusion This study demonstrates the clinical relevance studying the spatial distribution of malignant cell subpopulations through point pattern analysis. We anticipate that this machine learning pipeline can be developed for clinical use, enabling the classification of spatial phenotypes in DLBCL biopsies for patient stratification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAI in cancer detectionFrench-language works237,207