MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405048563 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2024-0034

Quantum information of a relativistic particle with position-dependent mass under the Aharonov–Casher effect

2024· article· en· W4405048563 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. R. P. Moreira, P. O. Amadi, A. N. Ikot, R. Horchani, Norshamsuri Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPosition (finance)Relativistic particleQuantum mechanicsParticle (ecology)Quantum electrodynamicsRelativistic quantum chemistryClassical mechanicsElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, the influence of the Aharonov–Casher (AC) effect is investigated for a relativistic particle with position-dependent mass through Shannon quantum information. Shannon’s formalism is appropriate because its results suggest explanations for the measurement uncertainties of a quantum system. To calculate Shannon’s entropy, it is necessary to obtain the description of quantum eigenstates. Using the eigenstates obtained, we analyzed the system quantum information in position and momentum space. Considering the results of Shannon’s entropy, it is possible to understand the influence of the AC effect and the position-dependent mass on the quantum information. It was possible to notice that the informational content decreases in the position space when we increase the value of the parameter that controls the mass profile. This result is strong, as it indicates a decrease in uncertainties related to particle position measurements. The opposite happens when we increase the quantum phase ΦAC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsFrench-language works237,207