MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405053975 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-212068

<i>A Multicenter Review of Quality Care Metrics for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease Presenting to Community Hospitals in Southwestern Ontario</i>

2024· article· en· W4405053975 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marco A. Herrera Quijano, Pedrom Farid, Andrea Cervi

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorWindsor Regional HospitalWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiseaseSickle cell anemiaMulticenter studyPediatricsIntensive care medicineInternal medicineRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: While sickle cell disease (SCD) represents the most common inherited hemoglobinopathy, patients with SCD have been subjected to healthcare resource disparity for a multitude of reasons, including a lack of healthcare provider awareness of the disease and its complications. In Ontario, Canada, quality standards have been developed to address these inequities and promote prompt delivery of care for patients with SCD presenting to the hospital; however, uptake of these care metrics into routine clinical practice is variable. Most of the efforts toward SCD care optimization have been focused on establishing protocols in tertiary care academic centers to guide the recognition and management of acute SCD complications, such as vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) which represent the primary presenting morbidity associated with SCD. However, many Canadian patients seek care from community-based institutions where SCD care pathways may be lacking. Our study aims to better understand the quality of care provided to patients with SCD presenting to community hospitals by measuring care metrics defined by current guidelines. Methods: A retrospective chart review of adult patients (18 years of age and older) with SCD who presented to Emergency Departments (EDs) in southwestern Ontario, Canada, between January 2018 and December 2023. We evaluated patient presentations to Windsor Regional Hospital (WRH) and Erie Shores HealthCare (ESHC), encompassing the major community hospitals across southwestern Ontario. We assessed time from ED triage registration to analgesia delivery, type of analgesia, inpatient admission rates, ED return within 72 hours of discharge, and documented follow-up at discharge. Quality care metrics were entered into an institutional REDCap database and descriptively analyzed. Results: Thirty-two ED visits corresponding to thirteen unique patients occurred between 2018-2023 across three hospital sites. The median age at ED visit was 25.9 years [interquartile range (IQR) 22.4, 29.4], with most patients being male (n=25; 78.1%). VOC represented the most common reason for ED visit (n=23; 71.9%), followed by hepatobiliary disease (n=3; 9.4%), acute chest syndrome (n=2; 6.3%), and priapism (n=2; 6.3%). The median length of ED stay was 14.1 hours (IQR 8.7, 19.1). The median time from ED triage registration to analgesia delivery was 4.1 hours (IQR 1.8, 7.7). None of the patients presenting with VOC received analgesia within 30 minutes of triage registration, and only 2 (8.7%) received analgesia within the first hour. Twenty-six patients (81.25%) received intravenous opioids, 8 (25%) were given NSAIDs, and 11 (34.4%) received acetaminophen; most patients (61.5%) received opioids alone. Eighteen patients (56.3%) required admission to the hospital from ED, with a median length of inpatient stay of 72 hours (IQR 40.1, 106.3). Among the 14 patients (43.7%) discharged home from the ED, 14.3% returned to the ED within 72 hours of discharge. Conclusions: Most patients with SCD presenting to community hospitals in southwestern Ontario, Canada are not receiving the quality standards of care set forth by the Ontario Ministry of Health or American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines. Patients presenting with VOC should ideally be treated within 30 minutes of ED triage registration, which did not occur in any patients in our cohort. Moreover, most patients were treated with opioids alone as opposed to a multimodal analgesia approach, and the organization of Hematology follow-up at discharge was variably described. We aim to use these data to advocate for enhanced resources for patients with SCD in our region and community hospitals, in general, to promote streamlined delivery of care for patients presenting to the ED.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders→French-language works237,207→