MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405054252 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.s531

Modeling of Hydrodynamic Regimes for the Thuan An Estuary

2024· article· en· W4405054252 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nguyen Thanh Hung, Vu Dinh Cuong, Nguyễn Tiến Thành, Nguyen Van Hung, Trieu Quang Quan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoastal and Marine Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstuaryGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Located in the southeast of Hue city in Thua Thien Hue province, Thuan An estuary plays a crucial role as a waterway and flood drainage pathway for the Huong River. Importantly, the morphology of the Thuan An estuary has been subjected to continuous change during monsoon seasons with the process of sediments in the estuary and erosion along the northern and southern coasts. Remarkably, the process of sediments directly impacts flood drainage and navigation along the waterway, as well as the sustainable development of Thua Thien Hue marine economy. Therefore, the goal of this study is to insightfully provide hydrodynamic regimes using a Delft3D model combined with ArcGIS software. The results showed that the estuary is wave-dominated lowland coasts. The coastal barrier is formed from sand that is transported along the shoreline by wave-driven longshore currents. During the northeast monsoon, river flow is significantly small, tidal currents combine with longshore currents by waves to form a strong longshore current with direction from northeast to southwest. Whereas, during the southwest monsoon, the sandbar extending from the southern side expands northward, leading to sedimentation accumulation at the river mouth channel. Specifically, a sandbar is formed at the river mouth with an accumulation of up to about 0.8 m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.416
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Management ModelingSame topicCoastal and Marine DynamicsFrench-language works237,207