MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405054612 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-211127

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Increases the Risk for Developing Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance in Asian Populations

2024· article· en· W4405054612 on OpenAlexaff
Su‐Hsin Chang, Mei Wang, Pin-Xiang Chen, Sylvia H. Hsu, Ming-Che Hu, Chia‐Cheng Wei

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significanceMedicineHazard ratioInternal medicineMultiple myelomaEpidemiologyType 2 Diabetes MellitusDiabetes mellitusImmunologyEndocrinologyMonoclonalConfidence intervalAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Epidemiological studies have shown inconsistent evidence of the association between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and lymphoproliferative disorders, including monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), the most common plasma cell disorder. MGUS is also a premalignant condition of multiple myeloma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, light-chain amyloidosis, or related conditions. Studies have shown that the association between T2DM and MGUS may be explained by insulin resistance and chronic inflammation via inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukin-1β. However, this association may be attenuated by the use of T2DM medications. This association is further perplexed by well-established racial differences in the prevalence and incidence of T2DM and MGUS, with a higher percentage of Black populations inflicted with the two diseases than their White counterparts. It is however unclear whether the association holds in Asian populations, as these populations are understudied. The goal of this study was to examine whether T2DM increased the risk for MGUS in Asian populations. Methods: We used data from Taiwan National Health Insurance databases. Taiwan National Health Insurance is a national health insurance system introduced in 1995. As the enrollment is mandatory, 99% of the citizens (>95% are Asians) are enrolled. We identified patients diagnosed with T2DM from 2001-2021. The outcome was time from age 16 (baseline) to MGUS diagnosis, if any. The association between T2DM and MGUS was estimated by a multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) using the Fine-Gray distribution hazard model with death as a competing event and incident T2DM as time-varying exposure. The covariates included age at incident T2DM, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) at baseline. Results: This study included 3,195,750 individuals who had incident T2DM between 2001 and 2021. Among them, 53.7% were female, mean CCI was 0.01 (standard deviation, std, 0.14), 1,620 (0.05%) developed MGUS with a median follow-up of 51 (interquartile range, 41-60) years. The mean age at incident T2DM was 57 (std 14) years and the mean age at MGUS was 70 (std 12) years. In the multivariable analysis, T2DM increased the risk for MGUS (aHR: 2.33, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.93-2.81, p <0.0001). In addition, male sex (aHR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.09-1.33, p =0.0002) and higher CCI (aHR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.06-1.99, p =0.0221) were independently associated with higher risk for MGUS. Older age at incident T2DM was negatively associated with the risk for MGUS (aHR: 0.990, 95% CI: 0.985-0.995, p <0.0001). Conclusions and Relevance: In Taiwan, with populations predominantly Asian, T2DM increases the risk for developing MGUS by 133% and the risk for MGUS decreases by age at incident T2DM. More studies in other Asian countries are needed to confirm the generalizability of a positive association between T2DM and MGUS in Asian populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207