MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405054916 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-209033

Substantial Variability in Platelet Transfusion Practice in a Patient-Level Audit of 56,204 Transfusions across 22 Hospitals

2024· article· en· W4405054916 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Ryan, Yang Liu, Sheharyar Raza, Janique Dyba, Donald M. Arnold, Anne Loeffler, Amol A. Verma, Fahad Razak, Jeannie Callum

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood transfusion and management
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of TorontoCanadian Blood ServicesMcMaster UniversityQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAuditPlatelet transfusionEmergency medicineBlood transfusionPlateletInternal medicineIntensive care medicinePediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Platelet transfusions are the second most commonly transfused blood product after red blood cells, with over 2 million units transfused annually in the United States. Despite randomized trials and evidence-based guidelines, recent audits have found high rates of unnecessary transfusion, ranging from 22% to 42%, driven primarily by prophylactic transfusion in non-bleeding patients at a threshold over 10,000/uL. Our multicenter, retrospective observational study sought to characterize transfused patients, assess time trends, and describe variability in pre-transfusion platelet counts across 22 hospital sites. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter observation study of general medicine wards, subspecialty wards (including hematology-oncology), and critical care areas at 32 hospitals from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2022 participating in the GEMINI data platform (https://geminimedicine.ca/). Ten sites were excluded for invalid platelet transfusion data. A platelet unit was defined as any platelet type, including apheresis units and pooled whole blood derived platelets. Any platelet units issued within 60 minutes of one another without repeat platelet count between units was considered part of one transfusion event. A transfusion event was tied to the closest platelet count that occurred within the preceding 24 hours. Our primary analysis examined variability in pre-transfusion platelet count across clinical diagnosis, patient subgroups, hospital sites, and clinician characteristics. Results: Across 804,067 admissions over 22 hospitals, 17,777 (2.2%) involved at least one platelet transfusion. The analysis included 56,204 platelet transfusion events. The most common primary diagnoses of transfused patients were malignancy (25.1%), cardiovascular disease (19%), gastrointestinal disease (10.2%) and traumatic injury (8.9%). In an analysis of platelet units per transfusion event, 93.6% were given as 1 unit, 5.2% as 2 units and 1.2% as >2 units. No pre-transfusion platelet count was performed in the preceding 24 hours for 7.2% of transfusion events. Most platelet transfusions were prescribed by Hematology-Oncology (43.2%) and Internal Medicine (20.6%) with median pre-transfusion platelet count being 9,000/uL [IQR 7,000-17,000] and 18,000/uL [9,000-38,000] respectively. Specialties transfusing at the highest median thresholds were Cardiothoracic Surgery (108,000/uL [66,000-174,000]), other surgical specialties (65,000/uL [40,000-100,000]) and Cardiology (53,000/uL [27,000-127,000]). After adjusting for prescriber subspecialty, transfusion threshold was significantly higher with increasing years out of practice, but there was no statistically significant association with prescriber sex. The proportion of platelet transfusion events with pre-transfusion platelet count above 50,000/uL ranged widely from 1.6% to 55.4% across hospital sites. Patients with a diagnosis of hematologic malignancy or other malignancy were transfused at a lower threshold (10,000/uL [7,000-18,000] and 16,000/uL [8,000-34,000] respectively) than patients without known malignancy (42,000/uL [20,000-84,000]). Pre-transfusion platelet count thresholds were stable across the 5-year study period. Conclusion: Our study highlights substantial variability in pre-transfusion platelet counts across different hospital sites, patient diagnoses, and prescriber characteristics. Highlighting practice variation may allow for targeted change interventions to promote guideline adherence and reduce unnecessary transfusion and associated harms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicBlood transfusion and management→French-language works237,207→