Detection of Traceability Features Embedded in Metal Additive Manufacturing Components by Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract With the continuous advancement of additive manufacturing (AM) processes, ensuring that traceability and security for AM components has become paramount. Embedding unique identification features in AM components, akin to fingerprints, is essential for logistics management, certification, and counterfeiting prevention. In this article, we propose a novel approach utilizing quick response (QR) codes embedded via arrangements of unmelted features in rectangular, cylindrical, and spherical shapes within steel blocks (MPIF 4406) fabricated using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). While computed tomography (CT) has been the dominant method for reading embedded QR codes, this article utilizes high-frequency phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) for reading these QR codes for the first time. Due to the layer-by-layer manufacturing process, the up-facing printed surfaces of the QR codes exhibit smooth characteristics (upskin), while the down-facing surfaces are rough (downskin). Ultrasound images from both surfaces are captured, each yielding distinct results. These captured images undergo image processing to compare them with their original designs. Linear and nonlinear image processing filters are applied to enhance the captured images, followed by feature extraction using two methods, Residual Network-50 (ResNet-50) and Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG), to evaluate their similarity to the original QR codes. The results reveal similarity percentages ranging from 70% to 85%. Most QR code images are readable, with upskin ultrasonic data providing better readability. This research underscores high-frequency PAUT as a promising solution for the rapid scanning of embedded QR codes in metal AM components, showcasing its potential for enhancing traceability and security in AM processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".