MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405070528 · doi:10.3390/siuj5060062

It’s Getting Hot in There: In Vitro Study on Ureteral Tissue Thermal Profiles During Laser Ureteral Lithotripsy

2024· article· en· W4405070528 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhou Yin Tee, Chun Hou Yong, Yue Keng Goh, Meng Shi Lim

Bibliographic record

VenueSociété Internationale d’Urologie Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaser lithotripsyLithotripsyUreteroscopyLaserURETEROSCOPEHolmiumMedicineLaser power scalingBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceSurgeryUreterOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The integration of laser technology in urologic interventions, especially ureteral lithotripsy, has greatly advanced the field, with laser lithotripsy becoming the preferred method for treating ureteric stones via ureteroscopy. Recent advancements focus on enhancing power settings and reducing operating times, introducing high-power laser equipment capable of frequencies up to 120 Hz. However, concerns arise regarding thermal injuries to adjacent tissues due to increased energy delivery, potentially causing ureteric strictures. Objective: To explore temperature dynamics during ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy, considering factors like laser power settings and ureteroscope size, to optimize outcomes and mitigate risks for patients. Methods: A simulated in vitro model for ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy was designed with a holmium laser. Measurements of the temperature were recorded using a thermocouple placed at the laser tip at different sizes of ureteroscope (URS 6.0 Fr and URS 7.0 Fr), holmium laser (272 µm and 365 µm), various power settings (5 to 25 Hz; 0.2 to 3.0 J) and activation durations (3 to 30 s). Analysis of the variables associated with temperature change was performed. Results: All of the variables showed rising temperature trends as the laser activation time was prolonged, while ureteroscope size had no significant impact. Smaller laser fibers exhibited lower overall temperature profiles, around 34–35 °C. Notably, power settings significantly influenced temperature, with a substantial rise at 20 W (42.62 °C) and 30 W (40.02 °C). There was a significant rise in temperature as power (J × Hz) increased, where frequency carries a higher effect than energy at the same power setting. Conclusions: The recommendation includes exercising caution with higher power levels, shorter activation times, and preferably using small-caliber laser fibers to maintain lower temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociété Internationale d’Urologie JournalSame topicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207