MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405079563 · doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1387069

The underground argon project: procurement and purification of argon for dark matter searches and beyond

2024· article· en· W4405079563 on OpenAlexaff
P. Agnes, H.O. Back, W. Bonivento, M. G. Boulay, N. Canci, M. Caravati, S. Cebrián, V. Cocco, D. Díaz Mairena, D. Franco, F. Gabriele, D. Gahan, C. Galbiati, P. Garcı́a-Abia, A. Gendotti, T. Hessel, S. Horikawa, Rodrigo López Manzano, L. Luzzi, M. Martínez, V. Pesudo, M. Razeti, A. Renshaw, L. Romero, A. Rubbia, R. Santorelli, M. Simeone, A. Sotnikov, A. Steri, Sara Sulis

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación
KeywordsDark matterArgonPhysicsRecoilWIMPWeakly interacting massive particlesNuclear physicsAstrophysicsAtomic physicsDark energyCosmologyScalar field dark matter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The existence of dark matter in the universe is inferred from abundant astrophysical and cosmological observations. The Global Argon Dark Matter Collaboration (GADMC) aims to perform the searches for dark matter in the form of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), whose collisions with argon nuclei would produce nuclear recoils with tens of keV energy. Argon has been considered an excellent medium for the direct detection of WIMPs as argon-based scintillation detectors can make use of pulse shape discrimination (PSD) to separate WIMP-induced nuclear recoil signals from electron recoil backgrounds with extremely high efficiency. However, argon-based direct dark matter searches must confront the presence of intrinsic 39 Ar as the predominant source of electron recoil backgrounds (it is a beta-emitter with an endpoint energy of 565 keV and half-life of 269 years). Even with PSD, the 39 Ar activity in atmospheric argon (AAr), mainly produced and maintained by cosmic ray-induced nuclear reactions, limits the ultimate size of argon-based detectors and restricts their ability to probe very-low-energy events. The discovery of argon from deep underground wells with significantly less 39 Ar than that in AAr was an important step in the development of direct dark matter detection experiments using argon as the active target. Thanks to pioneering research and successful R&D, in 2012, the first 160 kg batch of underground argon (UAr) was extracted from a CO 2 well in Cortez, Colorado. The DarkSide-50 experiment at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory (LNGS) in Italy, the first liquid argon detector ever operated with a UAr target, demonstrated a ∼ 1,400 suppression of the 39 Ar activity with respect to the atmospheric argon. An even larger suppression is expected for 42 Ar (another intrinsic beta-emitter with the 42 K daughter isotope, also a beta-emitter) as its production is expected mainly in the upper atmosphere. Following the results of DarkSide-50, the GADMC initiated the UAr project for extraction from underground and cryogenic purification of 100 t of argon to be used as a target in the next-generation experiment DarkSide-20k. This paper contains a description of the Urania Plant in Cortez, Colorado, where UAr is extracted; the Aria Plant in Sardinia, Italy, an industrial-scale plant comprising a 350-m state-of-the-art cryogenic isotopic distillation column, designed for further purification of the extracted argon and further reduction of the isotopic abundance of 39 Ar; and DArT, a facility for UAr radiopurity qualification at the Canfranc Underground Laboratory (LSC), Spain. Moreover, the high radiopurity of UAr leads to other possible applications, for instance, for those neutrinoless double-beta decay experiments using argon as shielding material or, more generally, for all those activities on argon-based detectors in high-energy physics or nuclear physics, which will be briefly discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PhysicsSame topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207