MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405080132 · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54951-2

Surface frustrated Lewis pairs in titanium nitride enable gas phase heterogeneous CO2 photocatalysis

2024· article· en· W4405080132 on OpenAlexaff
Yunjie Zou, Chengliang Mao, Mingkai Xu, Chao Xing, R. L. Wang, Geoffrey A. Ozin, Lan Ling

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Outstanding Youth Foundation of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLewis acids and basesFrustrated Lewis pairCatalysisOxideHeterogeneous catalysisChemistryNitrideInorganic chemistryMaterials scienceNanotechnologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gas-phase heterogeneous catalytic CO2 hydrogenation to commodity chemicals and fuels via surface frustrated Lewis pairs is a growing focus of scientific and technological interest. Traditional gas-phase heterogeneous surface frustrated Lewis pair catalysts primarily involve metal oxide-hydroxides (MOH•••M). An avenue to improve the process performance metrics lies in replacing the Lewis base MOH with a stronger alternative; an intriguing example being the amine MNH2 in metal nitrides. This study establishes a proof-of-concept that an amine-type photoactive surface frustrated Lewis pair (MNH2•••M) can be constructed in titanium nitride (TiNxOy) when integrated with a nanoscale platinum spillover co-catalyst. This surface frustrated Lewis pair, comprising Ti-NH2 as the Lewis base and low-valent Ti as the Lewis acid, facilitates the gas-phase light-assisted heterogeneous reverse water-gas shift reaction. The reaction proceeds via a surface-active carbamate intermediate, Ti-(H2N-COO)-Ti, whereby the synergism of Lewis acidic and Lewis basic sites endows it with superior performance indicators compared to TiNxOy alone, as well as conventional platinum supported metal oxides. Heterogeneous surface frustrated Lewis pairs catalysis have been predominantly focused on metal oxide hydroxides. This study instead explores a different chemical composition space by shifting from metal oxides to metal nitrides for CO2 photoreduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207