MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405081720 · doi:10.1242/jeb.246636

Naked mole-rats restrict reproduction by rank

2024· article· en· W4405081720 on OpenAlexaff
Carol Best

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReproductionMoleRank (graph theory)ZoologyBiologyMathematicsChemistryStatisticsCombinatoricsEcologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Naked mole-rats are fascinating little creatures. They live in large social colonies underground, where they eat tubers, dig tunnels, defend their colony from predators and reproduce. That last one, however, is usually restricted to just the dominant female of the colony (the queen) and a dominant male. This means that the vast majority of the colony, including all the subordinate females, do not produce offspring. Physiologically, these females are unable to have young because their fertility is reduced – meaning that the hormonal signalling pathway from their brain to their ovaries is apparently suppressed. However, this suppression seems to be alleviated when the subordinate females are taken away from their colony: within a week, their fertility is restored and they are able to reproduce once again. To figure out what mechanism is behind this suppression of reproduction in the subordinate females, Daniel Hart, Erin Roberts and colleagues at the Universities of Pretoria and Cape Town in South Africa took a closer look at the physiology of the females in their naked mole-rat colonies.An important player in the hormonal signalling pathway needed for reproduction is luteinizing hormone, which tends to be lower in subordinate naked mole-rats compared with the queens. Luteinizing hormone is produced by the pituitary gland, just beneath the brain, and signals to the ovaries to make the changes required for reproduction. When these changes are complete, the ovaries signal back to the brain and pituitary to say, ‘that's enough’, and they respond by shutting down luteinizing hormone production in a process called negative feedback. The researchers thought that negative feedback may be overactive in subordinates, leading to lower luteinizing hormone and reproductive dysfunction. To test this, they surgically removed the ovaries of queens and subordinate females to remove these negative feedback signals and measured the luteinizing hormone levels in the animals’ blood, expecting a greater luteinizing hormone rise in subordinates than in queens. However, luteinizing hormone levels rose similarly in both, so this probably wasn't the fertility-suppressing culprit.Next, they turned their attention to their second suspect in the search for the reproductive disruptor: the stress response. Why? Because the queen is a bit of a bully, with a tendency to shove and even bite her subordinates. When animals experience a stressful situation, they produce the hormone cortisol to help them cope and, in some species, cortisol can reduce fertility. They measured cortisol in the blood of queens and subordinate females and found, unexpectedly, that the stress hormone was lower in the blood of the subordinates. Given cortisol levels were not high in the subordinates, this stress hormone was probably not the culprit either.When stressed, animals can produce their own pain relievers, called endogenous opioid peptides. These internally produced pain relievers can interfere with fertility and so were suspect number three. Using a drug called naloxone, Hart, Roberts and colleagues blocked the ability of these pain relievers to work and then measured the animals’ luteinizing hormone levels, expecting the blockade of internally produced pain relievers to enhance the rise in hormone levels. Instead, they saw the opposite: luteinizing hormone barely rose when the subordinate naked mole-rat females were treated with naloxone, suggesting that endogenous opioid peptide pain relievers aren't interfering with the subordinate naked mole-rats’ fertility.It seems that feedback signals from the ovaries that reduce luteinizing hormone levels, stress and internally produced pain relievers are not responsible for the suppression of the subordinate naked mole-rats’ fertility. Now that the researchers have ruled out these major suspects, they've set their sights on some new suspects for investigation, including the multifunctional hormone prolactin. So, the curious case of how these social, subterranean, sparsely haired rodents regulate their reproduction based on rank remains to be unravelled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental Biology→Same topicBat Biology and Ecology Studies→French-language works237,207→