Decreased serum SLC7A11 and GPX4 levels may reflect disease severity of acute ischaemic stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the levels of solute carrier family seven number 11 (SLC7A11) and glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) in the serum of patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) and their relationship with disease severity.MethodsA total of 148 patients with AIS together with 148 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. The expression levels of SLC7A11 and GPX4 in serum were detected immediately as early as possible. Radiographic severity was detected by Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). Disease severity was evaluated using modified Rankin Scale (mRS). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) expression levels were also measured. A correlation analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between the expression levels of SLC7A11 and GPX4 with the clinical severity of the disease and the levels of hs-CRP and MMP-9. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized to assess the potential of SLC7A11 and GPX4 as diagnostic markers.ResultsCompared to the HC group, the serum expression levels of SLC7A11 and GPX4 were significantly lower in the AIS group. Serum SLC7A11 levels were positively associated with serum GPX4 levels. The AIS group included 50 patients with mild neurological impairment, 52 with moderate neurological impairment, and 46 with severe neurological impairment. AIS patients with mild neurological impairment had drastically higher serum SLC7A11 and GPX4 levels compared with those with moderate neurological impairment. AIS patients with moderate neurological impairment showed significantly higher serum SLC7A11 and GPX4 concentrations compared with those with severe neurological impairment. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that both serum SLC7A11 and GPX4 may both act as potential indicators for evaluating of AIS disease severity. In addition, both serum SLC7A11 and GPX4 levels were positively correlated with ASPECTS. Both serum SLC7A11 and GPX4 levels were negatively associated with hs-CRP as well as MMP-9 levels. Serum SLC7A11 and GPX4 levels were significantly increased following comprehensive therapy.ConclusionsDecreased SLC7A11 and GPX4 levels may reflect disease severity of AIS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".