MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405087241 · doi:10.56197/2786-5827/2024-3-4-2

PROSPECTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LITHIUM INDUSTRY IN UKRAINE

2024· article· en· W4405087241 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific bulletin of International Association of scientists Series Economy management security technologies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Issues in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLithium (medication)BusinessPolitical sciencePsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. A leading trend in modern development is the growing consumption of energy. Energy availability is a critical component for supporting the maintenance of living standards and stimulating industrial production. Currently, the role of critical materials required for the production of energy-saving devices and renewable energy technologies (lithium, cobalt, nickel) is growing. The global lithium market is currently growing rapidly due to increased demand for batteries, electric vehicles and renewable energy sources. Ukraine is among the countries that potentially have prospects to become a participant in lithium manufacturing chains. Materials and methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study is the scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists, as well as statistical data. Results and discussion. The article identifies the most important factors influencing the development of the global lithium market. The key players in the global lithium market are analyzed in the regional context. The leaders of the global lithium products market are: USA, Australia, Chile, Canada and China. The dynamics of supply and demand for lithium in the global market in 2022-2023 with forecasts for 2024-2025 are analyzed. Based on the analysis of indicators (market volume, revenue share of the region in the structure of the world market, average annual growth rate (CAGR)), the forecast volumes of the global lithium market until 2030 are determined. Conclusions. The global market for lithium products requires sustainable supplies, including through the discovery of new lithium deposits and the introduction of innovative processing technologies. Among the countries with prospects to become a member of lithium production chains is Ukraine, which has sufficient resource, labor and scientific potential. In general, investments in geological exploration, extraction and processing of lithium raw materials, and construction of lithium battery plants in Ukraine have promising opportunities and high profitability. In addition, investors' interest in financing investment projects for the extraction and processing of lithium in Ukraine will grow due to the following reasons: availability of natural resources; the strategic role of lithium in the global economy; European integration and geographical location; possible government support; global demand for electric vehicles and alternative energy. However, the war in Ukraine could deter potential investors due to risks associated with investment security, regulatory and bureaucratic barriers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it