MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405092470 · doi:10.1101/2024.12.02.24316741

Genetic Diversity and Expanded Phenotypes in Dystonia: Insights from Large-Scale Exome Sequencing

2024· preprint· en· W4405092470 on OpenAlexaff
Mirja Thomsen, Fabian Ott, Sebastian Loens, Gamze Kilic‐Berkmen, Ai Huey Tan, Shen‐Yang Lim, Ebba Lohmann, Lea Ipsen, Lena A. Nothacker, Linn Welzel, Frauke Hinrichs, Thorsten Odorfer, Kirsten E. Zeuner, Friederike Schumann, Andrea A. Kühn, Simone Zittel, Marius E. Moeller, Robert M. Pfister, Christoph Kamm, Anthony E. Lang, Yi Wen Tay, Marie Vidailhet, Emmanuel Roze, Joel S. Perlmutter, Jeanne Feuerstein, Victor S.C. Fung, Florence Chang, Richard L. Barbano, Steven Bellows, Aparna Wagle Shukla, Alberto J. Espay, Mark S. LeDoux, Brian D. Berman, Stephen G. Reich, Andres Deik, Andre Franke, Michael Wittig, Sören Franzenburg, Jens Volkmann, Norbert Brüggemann, H. A. Jinnah, Tobias Bäumer, Christine Klein, Hauke Busch, Katja Lohmann

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institutes of HealthDystonia CoalitionUniversiti MalayaDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsDystoniaExome sequencingEtiologyExomeGeneticsSanger sequencingGenetic heterogeneityMedicineBiologyPhenotypeMutationInternal medicineGenePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dystonia is one of the most prevalent movement disorders, characterized by significant clinical and etiological heterogeneity. Despite considerable heritability (∼25%) and the identification of several disease-linked genes, the etiology in most patients remains elusive. Moreover, understanding the correlations between clinical manifestation and genetic variants has become increasingly complex. To comprehensively unravel dystonia’s genetic spectrum, we performed exome sequencing on 1,924 dystonia patients [40.3% male, 92.9% White, 93.2% isolated dystonia, median age at onset (AAO) 33 years], including 1,895 index patients, who were previously genetically unsolved. The sample was mainly based on two dystonia registries (DysTract and the Dystonia Coalition). Further, 72 additional patients of Asian ethnicity, mainly from Malaysia, were also included. We prioritized patients with negative genetic prescreening, early AAO, positive family history, and multisite involvement of dystonia. Rare variants in genes previously linked to dystonia ( n =405) were examined. Variants were confirmed via Sanger sequencing, and segregation analysis was performed when possible. We identified 137 distinct likely pathogenic or pathogenic variants (according to ACMG criteria) across 51 genes in 163/1,924 patients [42.9% male, 85.9% White, 68.7% isolated dystonia, median AAO 19 years]. This included 153/1,895 index patients, resulting in a diagnostic yield of 8.1%. Notably, 77/137 (56.2%) of these variants were novel, with recurrent variants in EIF2AK2 , VPS16 , KCNMA1 , and SLC2A1 , and novel variant types such as two splice site variants in KMT2B , supported by functional evidence. Additionally, 321 index patients (16.9%) harbored variants of uncertain significance in 102 genes. The most frequently implicated genes included VPS16 , THAP1 , GCH1 , SGCE , GNAL , and KMT2B. Presumably pathogenic variants in less well-established dystonia genes were also found, including KCNMA1 , KIF1A , and ZMYND11. At least six variants (in ADCY5 , GNB1 , IR2BPL, KCNN2 , KMT2B , and VPS16 ) occurred de novo, supporting pathogenicity. ROC curve analysis indicated that AAO and the presence of generalized dystonia were the strongest predictors of a genetic diagnosis, with diagnostic yields of 28.6% in patients with generalized dystonia and 20.4% in those with AAO < 30 years. This study provides a comprehensive examination of the genetic landscape of dystonia, revealing valuable insights into the frequency of dystonia-linked genes and their associated phenotypes. It underscores the utility of exome sequencing in establishing diagnoses within this heterogeneous condition. Despite prescreening, presumably pathogenic variants were identified in almost 10% of patients. Our findings reaffirm several dystonia candidate genes and expand the phenotypic spectrum of some of these genes to include prominent, sometimes isolated dystonia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207