MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405092768 · doi:10.1109/tafe.2024.3504956

TranSEF: Transformer Enhanced Self-Ensemble Framework for Damage Assessment in Canola Crops

2024· article· en· W4405092768 on OpenAlexafffund
Muhib Ullah, Abdul Bais, Tyler Wist

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on AgriFood Electronics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsCanolaEnvironmental scienceAgronomyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crop health monitoring is crucial for implementing timely and effective interventions that ensure sustainability and maximize crop yield. Flea beetles (FB), Crucifer (Phyllotreta cruciferae) and Striped (Phyllotreta striolata), pose a significant threat to canola crop health and cause substantial damage if not addressed promptly. Accurate and timely damage quantification is crucial for implementing targeted pest management strategies if insecticidal seed treatments are overcome by FB feeding to minimize yield losses if the action threshold is exceeded. Traditional manual field monitoring for FB damage is time-consuming and error-prone due to reliance on human visual estimates of FB damage. This article proposes TranSEF, a novel self-ensemble semantic segmentation algorithm that utilizes a hybrid convolutional neural network-vision transformer (ViT) encoder–decoder framework. The encoder employs a modified cross-stage partial DenseNet (CSPDenseNet), MCSPDNet, which enhances attention to tiny regions by aggregating spatially aware features from shallow layers with deeper, more abstract features. ViTs effectively capture the global context in the decoder by modeling long-range dependencies and relationships across the image. Each decoder independently processes inputs from different stages of the MCSPDNet, acting as a weak learner within an ensemble-like approach. Unlike traditional ensemble learning approaches that train weak learners separately, TranSEF is trained end-to-end, making it a self-ensembling framework. TranSEF uses hybrid supervision with a composite loss function, where decoders generate independent predictions and simultaneously supervise each other. TranSEF achieves IoU scores of 0.831 for canola leaves and 0.807 for FB damage, and the overall mIoU improved by 2.29% and 1.56% over DeepLabv3+ and SegFormer, respectively, while utilizing only 35.42 M trainable parameters-significantly fewer than DeepLabv3+ (63 M) and SegFormer (61 M).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on AgriFood ElectronicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207