Multi-model ensemble for long-term statistical trend analysis of observed gridded precipitation and temperature data in the São Francisco River Basin, Brazil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT For effective management practices and decision-making, the uncertainties associated with regional climate models (RCMs) and their scenarios need to be assessed in the context of climate change. This study analyzes long-term trends in precipitation and temperature data sets (maximum and minimum values) from the NASA, Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Prediction (NEX-GDDP), under the São Francisco River Basin Representative Concentration Path (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5, using the REA (Reliable Ensemble Average) method. In each grid, the built multi-model was bias-corrected using the CMhyd software for annual, dry, wet, and pre-season periods – for historical (1961-2005) and future (2006-2100) periods. The multi-model and four different methods, namely: The Mann-Kendall, Mann-Kendall pre-brightening test, bias-corrected pre-brightening, and Spearman correlation, were used to detect trends in precipitation, and minimum and maximum temperature. In the analysis of precipitation and temperature metrics, the results for the NRMSD showed that, in general, the CSIRO model presented more satisfactory results in all physiographic regions. Person's correlation coefficient showed a better adjustment of precipitation for the MIROC5, EC.EARTH and NORESMI1 models, in areas of sub-medium and upper São Francisco. For the minimum temperature, the CSIRO and NORESMI1 models showed the best fit, in general. At maximum temperature, the EC.EARTH and CSIRO models showed more satisfactory results. With regard to trend analysis, the results indicated an increasing trend in mean annual temperature and precipitation across the basin. When analyzed by subregion, the results show an increasing trend in monthly average minimum and maximum temperatures in the middle and lower SFRB, while average monthly rainfall increases during the rainy season and preseason in Upper São Francisco. The results of this research can be used by government entities, such as Civil Defense, to subsidize decision-making that requires actions/measures to relocate people/communities to less risky locations to minimize risk or vulnerability situations for the population living nearby to the river.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".