MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405097148 · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2024.117166

Construction of a tertiary model and uncertainty analysis for the effect of time, temperature, available chlorine concentration of slightly acidic electrolyzed water on salmonella enteritidis and background total bacteria counts on chicken

2024· article· en· W4405097148 on OpenAlexaff
Yao Zang, Yitian Zang, Qiang Zhang, Guosheng Zhang, Jie Hu, Mingming Tu, Wenduo Qiao, Mengzhen Hu, Boya Fu, Dengqun Shu, Yanjiao Li, Xianghui Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueLWT · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChlorineSalmonella enteritidisSalmonellaBacteriaChemistryMicrobiologyFood scienceBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to investigate the combined effects of storage time, temperature, and available chlorine concentration (ACC) of slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW) on Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) and total viable background counts (TVC) on chicken meat surfaces. Models were validated with high accuracy (adj-R 2 > 0.95; RMSE < 0.20), and sensitivity analysis showed significant effects of time, temperature, and ACC on bacterial growth ( P < 0.05). Furthermore, temperature notably reduced the proportion of S. Enteritidis within TVC from 55% to 33% at lower temperatures ( P < 0.05), while ACC significantly affected maximum bacterial growth (a), growth rate (k) ( P < 0.05), and turning points in the growth curve (x c ) parameters of models. Furthermore, temperature and ACC interactions synergistically influenced growth rate (k) and turning point (x c ) parameters. Monte Carlo simulation supported the models' predictive capability in estimating S. Enteritidis distribution on chicken meat surfaces under varied conditions. The results from this study contribute to microbial risk assessments of S. Enteritidis in the chicken. • Built growth model using time, temperature, and SAEW for S. Enteritidis and TVC. • Temperature impacted S. Enteritidis more than TVC, altering its proportionality. • Found ACC, temperature, and their interaction had linear effects on parameters. • Proposed model to assess S. Enteritidis microbial risks on chicken.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLWTSame topicListeria monocytogenes in Food SafetyFrench-language works237,207